DeSica
Well-known member
Yes...some english language films are hard to follow simply because they are poorly made...nevermind being too incredible in their plots and actions to maintain any suspension of disbelief while watching them. How are non-english language films hard to follow...is it the reading for content?I laugh. I knew I'd get some flak for my post.
While I might have exaggerated things a bit, I do stick by my premise: films that are hard to follow or understand are hard to enjoy. This statement isn't limited to non-English or foreign films,
Right...and which films (foreign or otherwise) are you talking about there?When I said that a film without a soundtrack had "crappy audio," I didn't mean a film that didn't have hit songs in it. I actually would rather have a straight score without words than some top 10 hit. But what I don't want is NO music or audio.
I hate those films with no sound....I just can't think of any where the is no score, background or ambient noise...if any exist, I am sure I hate themAny film (foreign or domestic) that has entire 3-5 minute scenes with no background music, environmental audio, or other ambient noice is automatically playing with a handicap as far as I'm concerned. Silence should be used sparingly.
That is what the sub titles are for...dubbing is good for the folks who "don't read so good."As far as the language itself is concerned, most of the time it's very hard to concentrate on the plot when you're trying to figure out what exactly people are saying. Can it be done well? Of course. But more often than not, it isn't.
Are you suggesting Americans don't read well?Look at American films that have scenes with characters that are speaking a different language. They typically write the dialog such that you can read the subtitles without missing any important action, and the characters don't talk so fast that you have problems keeping up.
Actually, most non-english speakers I know have no problem. I saw Pulp Fiction in Havana, and the Cubans had no trouble keeping up. The rape thing didn't go over too well, though.But a film that was created for a target audience that doesn't speak English isn't made like that. That doens't mean it is a terrible film -- it just means I can't enjoy it. I'm sure American films are crappy to those who don't speak English for the same reasons.
Due to the ability to afford million dollar microphones that recod better sound than regular industry standard? Is it the audio f/x? "Man, Driven sure was a hunk of junk...but did u hear those engines ruining our ears?" Or is it because they can afford better songs?Of course our bigger budgets typically lead to better audio/soundtracks, so in that regard I do think there's a difference.
You're right about that. Somehow I don't think he was thinking about Missouri as a market anyway. People are too busy watching cars drive in circles (ovals..whatever) there.That said, to address the original poster, there are lots of people in the US that disagree with me, so just market to them... :cheesy: