News Media Manipulation Proof

Kirk Gillock

Rebel with a cause
Not sure who saw this on Yahoo! but this was one of the lead HEADLINE stories.

Official: Armstrong doping a "proven" fact

hmmmmm Sounds like he's guilty. And the first part of the story seems to continue the character asassination. That is, until the very end, when this is written:

"Separately, the lab said it could not confirm that the positive results were Armstrong's. It noted that the samples were anonymous..."

SHOULDN'T THEY LEAD WITH THAT PART??

Hey, before we drag an amazing athletes name through the mud, why don't we start by saying that all of this might not be true. Even if it turns out to be true, the facts should be presented first, NOT down at the bottom as a side-note.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050824/ap_on_sp_ot/cyc_armstrong_doping

Step-off soap box.
pk
 
Sad thing is that this happens all the time. Which is why you have to get your "facts" from multiple sources to confirm them. It is sad that you can't trust the news any more.
 
Back
Top