Throwback
Well-known member
Well, my Rode Wireless Go turned up on Friday and I have been playing around with it this weekend. I was under no illusions about its performance before buying and, with that in mind, it delivers as expected if not slightly better, especially if the RX unit is oriented vertically (i.e. parallel to the TX), which seems to be missed in most, if not all, reviews. The only slightly unexpected negative is the input sensitivity (for which, obviously, there is no control): for very loud singing/shouting, this seems to clip, so some form of pad might be needed in those circumstances (though most lavs don't have a high max SPL: perhaps, therefore, just use a less sensitive/high SPL lavs for those cases). I'm not a user of wireless (mostly recording/filming music) nor, indeed, a fan of lavs with their high self-noise, but purchased it for a particular project later this week (a music doc in the Alpujarras, for which I have to travel unusually light). The internal mic sounds very little different from my Rode lav (by which I mean their one with the Micon connectors), but, for the sake of noise against clothing (bad when using the inbuilt mic) and visibility, will be using the separate lav. There is no distinguishable difference between the lav into the recorder (SD Mixpre-3) direct vs wired: not that I would adopt the wireless approach unless essential and, of course, a (noisy) lav mic for dialogue is not the most discriminating test. For me, for a few distant shots where the TX unit can be attached (invisibly) on the front of the subject, it will be fine. For others, obviously, a more professional wireless may well be essential.
Cheers,
Roland
Cheers,
Roland