Bassman2003
Veteran
I do not want to come across as piliing on but from a distance, Panasonic seems to be holding on to a longer development cycle than the market is moving at. Yes, they were first to market with the AF-100 and it is a great acheivement, but the marketplace is moving very fast. Clearly the AF-100 is leaving the consumers with wanting more as its price has fallen like a meteor in just a year. Not a good investment. This is the year you refresh the camera because by NAB 2013 somebody is going to have a $5,000 RAW s35 camera that will steal the thunder.
I see this pricepoint as a pretty easy space for Panasonic to take. Panasonic has a loyal base. The users just want the feature combination of an FS-100 and an AF-100 with better image quality than the AF-100, Made by Panasonic. They could split the product into AVCHD and AVC-Intra just like the AC series.
The HPX-600 would have whooped up a year or two ago, now it is just another announcement to many.
It seems the under $10,000 above $3,500 segment has been left out of the party this NAB. My hope is that 4k takes over the over $10,000 range and the camera makers can have some cloud cover to make higher quality 1080p/720p cameras for under $10,000
I see this pricepoint as a pretty easy space for Panasonic to take. Panasonic has a loyal base. The users just want the feature combination of an FS-100 and an AF-100 with better image quality than the AF-100, Made by Panasonic. They could split the product into AVCHD and AVC-Intra just like the AC series.
The HPX-600 would have whooped up a year or two ago, now it is just another announcement to many.
It seems the under $10,000 above $3,500 segment has been left out of the party this NAB. My hope is that 4k takes over the over $10,000 range and the camera makers can have some cloud cover to make higher quality 1080p/720p cameras for under $10,000