x-angel
Well-known member
My name is Eric, and I a "rookie" videographer. I love video - always have. I am one of those crazy people that can go down the road listening to a song, and design a video in my head.
This past May, I shot my first wedding, and one of the cameras I used was a DVX-100A. I fell in love with it immediatley, and I am thinking about sticking with it exclusively. (Or atleast the Panasonic line)
I have read the reviews on the upcoming 100B and the "Bad Boy" 200. And it seems I am at at a crossroads.
I am about to deploy to Kosovo for a year, and so my check will be primarilty used to invest into my business. I won't be shooting just weddings either, and it looks like the Panasonic line is the best and most well rounded for most applications.
My conondrum: Do I invest into a DVX-100A? (because more than likely the prices will go through the floor with the release of the 100B) Spend a little extra and get the DVX-100B? Or go full bore and get the HVX-200?
I will be investing into 2 cameras for my business...one for me and one for my wife (she's my partner on this little venture), so whatever I get, I want them to be the same.
I pretty much think that the HVX200 will be out of my range for right now.
So I am stuck between 100A and the 100B. Even though I won't be shooting weddings exclusively, I know that will be the majority of what I do.
So with the 100A probably about to drop through the floor in price (currently at about $3500), I am stuck between going ahead and investing into the 100B, or sticking with the 100A.
My post production software will include Premier, After Effects, DVD Lab Pro, and a fews others. And I will not be making this purchase until mid-2006 (after I pay for the wife to come to europe during my R&R)
I am also thinking about investing into a sub $1000 1 CCD camera just to have, so I am not always having to risk my $3000+ investment.
So I throw this out there and would love any advice on this.
This past May, I shot my first wedding, and one of the cameras I used was a DVX-100A. I fell in love with it immediatley, and I am thinking about sticking with it exclusively. (Or atleast the Panasonic line)
I have read the reviews on the upcoming 100B and the "Bad Boy" 200. And it seems I am at at a crossroads.
I am about to deploy to Kosovo for a year, and so my check will be primarilty used to invest into my business. I won't be shooting just weddings either, and it looks like the Panasonic line is the best and most well rounded for most applications.
My conondrum: Do I invest into a DVX-100A? (because more than likely the prices will go through the floor with the release of the 100B) Spend a little extra and get the DVX-100B? Or go full bore and get the HVX-200?
I will be investing into 2 cameras for my business...one for me and one for my wife (she's my partner on this little venture), so whatever I get, I want them to be the same.
I pretty much think that the HVX200 will be out of my range for right now.
So I am stuck between 100A and the 100B. Even though I won't be shooting weddings exclusively, I know that will be the majority of what I do.
So with the 100A probably about to drop through the floor in price (currently at about $3500), I am stuck between going ahead and investing into the 100B, or sticking with the 100A.
My post production software will include Premier, After Effects, DVD Lab Pro, and a fews others. And I will not be making this purchase until mid-2006 (after I pay for the wife to come to europe during my R&R)
I am also thinking about investing into a sub $1000 1 CCD camera just to have, so I am not always having to risk my $3000+ investment.
So I throw this out there and would love any advice on this.