Network and Lumet

Mark Harris

Pain in the ass
Sidney Lumet has a new movie coming out, at like 86, and so I wanted to go back and review some of his work before checking this out. It had dawned on me that I hadn't seen anything of his in a while. So last night my GF and I got Network. She had not seen it at all before.

I did a search on here and did not find any topics for this, so started one.

If you have not seen it, you need to. It's an epic piece. The Cinematography is nice, but completely unobtrusive. Except for one amazing shot where Ned Beatty is giving his message to Peter Finch, and it is this really great locked down shot down a boardroom table, with the lamps forming perspective lines all directing to Ned Beatty at the far end. But there is no push in, no funny stuff with the camera, just a locked shot that is absolutely mesmerizing.

But in general, one thing I like about Lumet is that the photography is there to serve the story and not star in it. He is an extremely simple and direct filmmaker.

The writing is stellar(though it is wordy, just be warned. Chayefsky was a wordy son of a *****) But some of the most memorable speeches in film history. And the script is frighteningly prescient...

And the performances are off the hook. Bill Holden, Faye Dunaway(an actress with holes in her head where the spirits get in, just shockingly talented), Beatty, Duval, a cast to die for.

If you have not seen it, get it.

Next up I am going to get Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon (You know, back when Pacino could act? :) )
 
That shot of Beatty is great. Its one of those shots that stays with you, and the dark shadows in that scene are very eerie and effective. There is something to be said for simple and direct, especially when it comes to storytelling. Don't get in the way...
 
One of my favorite films..... ever

networkpitch2.JPG


Next up I am going to get Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon

Both awesome movies in their own right.
:thumbsup:
12 Angry men (mentioned in another thread recently) is another great example of Lumet's ability to really use the camera in an unobtrusive way that still serves the story in every single shot he chooses.

If anyone has not read Lumet's book "Making Movies," I would highly recommend it.
Its one of the more down to earth books about filmmaking that I've read - coming directly from one of the guys responsible for some amazing films over the past 50 decades.
 
Last edited:
Ah. I love this man. Network is in my top ten films ever made. I've read that book countless times even. Nice thread, good to know there's other Lumetniacs out there.
 
So, I am now watching The Verdict. I had it in my queue, then got busy with other things. But I have recently been re-reading some chapters in the McKee book, Story, and he talks about it, so I moved it to the top of my list.

And wow. If you haven't seen it, do. Just like in network, his shot selections are just so precise and meaningful. And he uses so many long shots, long takes, moving the camera maybe once, or pushing in as the scene focuses on two characters or one character, but for the most part, lets the actors and writing carry the dramatic weight. But he has the same kind of simplicity to his shot selection and scene staging.

Oh yeah, and it's written by Mamet.

I have already stolen shamelessly from network in one of my own films:

networkpitch2.JPG

god_3.jpg


and have been breaking down shots and working out the reasons for them in the Verdict as well :) They say steal from the best.

Hudson, you should do a breakdown of this film. Lumet is a real master of the craft.
 
Back
Top