I've put together a quick audio recorder test and review for my own use, and thought i'd make a peice to show online since I can't find anything similar.
I feel this test is unique since I've used a very low sensitivity dynamic microphone, the Sennheiser MD46. This is a common field reporters microphone. I've had a very tough time finding a recorder or preamp that can handle it. Below you will find my audio sample video clip, and my write up on the units.
Listen with headphones for best comparison.
https://vimeo.com/52597996
-------------------
I have tested several portable audio recorders, as well as my Juicedlink CX231 preamp w/5D Mark III.
Test: Recorded a simple audio test to the devices below using a Sennheiser MD46 interview microphone. Microphone held at about 4 inches from my mouth during all tests. I have normalized peaks from all audio clips to -12db, for some this meant lowering them slightly, and others such as the Juicedlink, this meant raising them quite a bit.
On several recorders I had to max out the gain on the device to get close to achieveing -12db on the device. The Marantz was one that came to mind that I could have gone higher on, this device has superior preamps to the other recorders. The Zoom H4N for example required max gain to get close to -12db.
My thoughts on the following (sound quality only)
Marantz PMD661: Excellent sound quality, preamps are great unless you go to max, but with my very low sensitivity MD46, a level of 7 out of 10 was sufficient to provide excellent -12db audio.
Roland R26: Okay preamps, good sound, some noticeable hiss, but lower than Zoom/Tascam.
Zoom H4N: Bad preamps, excessive hiss, however nice sound quality at lower levels.
Tascam DR100 Mk II: Almost same level as Zoom, slightly better preamps, good sound.
Juicedlink CX231: I was unable to reach -12db on the camera with the gain set to high and the trim knob cranked all the way with my MD46 Dynamic mic. On the 5D Mark III, manual audio was set to one notch above off. I normalized to -12 and experienced the same amount of hiss as on the Tascam recorder.
Thoughts on the devices (hardware)
Marantz PMD661: Nice build, locking XLR jacks. Old school operating system is a bit of a put off though for the money. You have to fumble around in the menu to change inputs, but that's not too bad.
My main complaint is that this unit has no powered plug-in mini-jack input. Only a line input. So mini-jack lav mics and so forth do not work on this device, you must use XLR.
Zoom H4N: Have used it for years, pretty good build, the case is weak, won't latch anymore. Lacks locking XLR jacks.
Tascam DR100 Mk II: Includes locking XLR jacks, but very plasticy build.
Roland R26: Horrible handling noise, you cannot touch it at all while using internal mics, if you adjust the recording volume while using internal mics, you can hear the knob turning. Works fine with plug in mini-jack mics. No locking XLR jacks, nice screen, much better O/S than Marantz, but preamps are lacking for low sensitivity mics.
Juicedlink: It's a metal box with switches and knobs, no complaints.
I feel this test is unique since I've used a very low sensitivity dynamic microphone, the Sennheiser MD46. This is a common field reporters microphone. I've had a very tough time finding a recorder or preamp that can handle it. Below you will find my audio sample video clip, and my write up on the units.
Listen with headphones for best comparison.
https://vimeo.com/52597996
-------------------
I have tested several portable audio recorders, as well as my Juicedlink CX231 preamp w/5D Mark III.
Test: Recorded a simple audio test to the devices below using a Sennheiser MD46 interview microphone. Microphone held at about 4 inches from my mouth during all tests. I have normalized peaks from all audio clips to -12db, for some this meant lowering them slightly, and others such as the Juicedlink, this meant raising them quite a bit.
On several recorders I had to max out the gain on the device to get close to achieveing -12db on the device. The Marantz was one that came to mind that I could have gone higher on, this device has superior preamps to the other recorders. The Zoom H4N for example required max gain to get close to -12db.
My thoughts on the following (sound quality only)
Marantz PMD661: Excellent sound quality, preamps are great unless you go to max, but with my very low sensitivity MD46, a level of 7 out of 10 was sufficient to provide excellent -12db audio.
Roland R26: Okay preamps, good sound, some noticeable hiss, but lower than Zoom/Tascam.
Zoom H4N: Bad preamps, excessive hiss, however nice sound quality at lower levels.
Tascam DR100 Mk II: Almost same level as Zoom, slightly better preamps, good sound.
Juicedlink CX231: I was unable to reach -12db on the camera with the gain set to high and the trim knob cranked all the way with my MD46 Dynamic mic. On the 5D Mark III, manual audio was set to one notch above off. I normalized to -12 and experienced the same amount of hiss as on the Tascam recorder.
Thoughts on the devices (hardware)
Marantz PMD661: Nice build, locking XLR jacks. Old school operating system is a bit of a put off though for the money. You have to fumble around in the menu to change inputs, but that's not too bad.
My main complaint is that this unit has no powered plug-in mini-jack input. Only a line input. So mini-jack lav mics and so forth do not work on this device, you must use XLR.
Zoom H4N: Have used it for years, pretty good build, the case is weak, won't latch anymore. Lacks locking XLR jacks.
Tascam DR100 Mk II: Includes locking XLR jacks, but very plasticy build.
Roland R26: Horrible handling noise, you cannot touch it at all while using internal mics, if you adjust the recording volume while using internal mics, you can hear the knob turning. Works fine with plug in mini-jack mics. No locking XLR jacks, nice screen, much better O/S than Marantz, but preamps are lacking for low sensitivity mics.
Juicedlink: It's a metal box with switches and knobs, no complaints.