Hi everyone,
While using the Rode HS1 headset microphone connected through the Micon-5 XLR adaptor to an Art USB Dual Pre mic preamp set on +40dB gain (almost the max), I still have to boost the amplitude by +5/+10 dB on postprod in order to reach a level equivalent to the one obtained with our reference mic (a Rode Podcaster). But, by doing so, I increase the noise (both electronic and environmental) at the same time to unacceptable level.
So, I have two questions:
1) Were such low level expected from the HS1? Or do I have to suspect some problem with my mic preamp?
2) Would I have notably better signal/noise ratio by using directly a preamp capable of +55/+60dB gain? Or do I have to stay with the current setup, counting only on a noise-removal filter to "clean up" the audio track?
The long story:
I have to shoot vocational training videos showing a technician performing various electronics/computer related tasks. Some footages are done at the technician workbench, while other show him installing various equipments on location. The set is particularly noisy with the hum and beeps of many electronic devices. We have to capture the comments of the technician "live" since the talent won't be available for any kind of re-recording afterward.
For the video part we will use a consumer-grade camcorder. As for the audio, using a microphone on a boom pole was not an option for practical reasons. A shotgun won't be adequate as for some tasks the technician will be back to the camera or even moving off-camera. We thought a Lav would have done the job, but some tests using a low quality one showed it capturing too much environmental noise (notably when the technician was using tools). Moreover, the results were not very consistent, depending of the movements of the technician's head and arms. We finally decided to use a headset microphone in order to have the capsule as close as possible of the technician mouth, still allowing him a full freedom of movement. Since we cannot afford (nor require) a wireless system, the mic is wired to a mic preamp providing +48V phantom power. We chose the Rode HS1 based on good reviews incl. the video review by Chad Johnson (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfhkjgS6KOY) were that mic sounds high and clear when connected directly both to a Sony EX1 camera or a Sony D-50 audio recorder. As a matter of fact, much higher than what I currently obtain. That's why I'm wondering if it is normal to have to somehow turn the gain up to +45/+50dB to reach comparable levels.
- Sylvain
While using the Rode HS1 headset microphone connected through the Micon-5 XLR adaptor to an Art USB Dual Pre mic preamp set on +40dB gain (almost the max), I still have to boost the amplitude by +5/+10 dB on postprod in order to reach a level equivalent to the one obtained with our reference mic (a Rode Podcaster). But, by doing so, I increase the noise (both electronic and environmental) at the same time to unacceptable level.
So, I have two questions:
1) Were such low level expected from the HS1? Or do I have to suspect some problem with my mic preamp?
2) Would I have notably better signal/noise ratio by using directly a preamp capable of +55/+60dB gain? Or do I have to stay with the current setup, counting only on a noise-removal filter to "clean up" the audio track?
The long story:
I have to shoot vocational training videos showing a technician performing various electronics/computer related tasks. Some footages are done at the technician workbench, while other show him installing various equipments on location. The set is particularly noisy with the hum and beeps of many electronic devices. We have to capture the comments of the technician "live" since the talent won't be available for any kind of re-recording afterward.
For the video part we will use a consumer-grade camcorder. As for the audio, using a microphone on a boom pole was not an option for practical reasons. A shotgun won't be adequate as for some tasks the technician will be back to the camera or even moving off-camera. We thought a Lav would have done the job, but some tests using a low quality one showed it capturing too much environmental noise (notably when the technician was using tools). Moreover, the results were not very consistent, depending of the movements of the technician's head and arms. We finally decided to use a headset microphone in order to have the capsule as close as possible of the technician mouth, still allowing him a full freedom of movement. Since we cannot afford (nor require) a wireless system, the mic is wired to a mic preamp providing +48V phantom power. We chose the Rode HS1 based on good reviews incl. the video review by Chad Johnson (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfhkjgS6KOY) were that mic sounds high and clear when connected directly both to a Sony EX1 camera or a Sony D-50 audio recorder. As a matter of fact, much higher than what I currently obtain. That's why I'm wondering if it is normal to have to somehow turn the gain up to +45/+50dB to reach comparable levels.
- Sylvain