Letus35 vs M2 Redrock micro

E

exechild

Member
Could people please weigh in on the major differences between these two adapters? I see that the M2 ranges between 999-1300 while the Letus35 starts at 300. I appreciate any help in researching these two pieces. Thanks
 
the letus35 is a static adapter, meaning the focus screen/GG does not move. What does this mean? If you sotp the iris of a 35mm lens down to passed F.4, you will notice that the grain is apparent. The only way to get rid of this is to vibrate/spin/oscilate the GG, which is what the M2 adapter does.

The material used for the GG is slightly different so you get a different light pass and bokeh.

One of them is much more expensive and requires batteries, but you get much more lattitude with the M2 for reasons of having a wider range of F stops whiel maintaining a clean image.

there are other things, but meh.
i picked up an Ifocus and i couldnt be happier, cheaper than the M2, around the same price as a letus and it came with a lens!
 
I would say the biggest difference between the two would be build quality, as I have been very happy with the image quality of the letus, although the corners do tend to get a tad soft, but not an issue when shooting 2.35:1 or even 1.85:1. When I upgrade my camera, I will most likely be upgrading my 35mm adapter, but the Letus has served me quite well, although it is a little "gorilla" looking compared to the M2
 
Jonathan,
I went to the software bisque site but saw no mention of the IFocus. Did you purchase it from them directly?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top