Legality of fan films?

djbobbyrhodes

Well-known member
Hey all,

I was just wondering if anyone knew anything about the legality of fan films. I recently came up with what I believe would have been a MUCH better sequel to the Indiana Jones franchise. Obviously, George Lucas isn't taking scripts from random people on the street. So I thought for fun, I might like to shoot a mock trailer or short based on my Indiana Jones idea. I know I wouldn't be able to profit from this. But am I going to get my pants sued off if I shoot this and put it on youtube?
 
That's entirely at the whim of Lucasfilm. They supposedly have a policy of "it's OK if you don't make money on it," but that's their voluntary policy, not a legal one. Could change whenever it strikes Lucas's fancy.
 
Is it important that it be Indiana Jones? Why not just create your own character who is vaguely similar to him? There are lots of characters who could be considered "rip-offs" of Indiana Jones (Lara Croft from Tomb Raider, Rick O'Connell from The Mummy, Nathan Drake from the Uncharted video games, etc.), but they are all just slightly different enough to be legally distinct.
 
If you make it a parody, you can claim fair use. Of course this doesn't keep anyone from suing you...
 
Hey all,

I was just wondering if anyone knew anything about the legality of fan films. I recently came up with what I believe would have been a MUCH better sequel to the Indiana Jones franchise. Obviously, George Lucas isn't taking scripts from random people on the street. So I thought for fun, I might like to shoot a mock trailer or short based on my Indiana Jones idea. I know I wouldn't be able to profit from this. But am I going to get my pants sued off if I shoot this and put it on youtube?

Absolutely, positively, NOT legal. Will you get your pants sued off for shooting and posting on youtube? Probably not. But it might quickly disappear....

As others have said, if you don't make any money and your film doesn't harm the property, they could turn a blind eye (although they could end up forcing you to sign away all rights to what you make to them).

From a legal standpoint, whether or not a rights holder chooses to enforce a copyright is entirely up to them. For trademark it's a bit different, because they have to actively police and enforce their trademark in order to protect it. If they fail to take action on infringing uses of their mark(s) they can loose them. Very different from copyright.

What's the idea?

Edit: Fair use for trademarks is a bit different than fair use for copyright. For Indiana Jones, I believe the name, logo, and character are all trademarked.

INDIANA JONES
Goods and Services

IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Pre-recorded audio tapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, compact discs, and video discs, featuring entertainment related to films, games, animation and music; computer game software; computer game software and manuals sold as a unit; computer video game software; computer video game software and manuals sold as a unit; interactive video game programs; interactive computer game programs, downloadable computer game software, downloadable interactive entertainment software for playing computer games, downloadable interactive entertainment software for playing video games. FIRST USE: 19881200. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19881200


IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: Children's activity books; novels for adults; art books; artist's materials, namely, pens and pencils; book covers; book marks; book plates; books containing puzzles and games; books featuring photographs; books for role-playing; books on movie-making; calendars; cardboard figures; children's books; children's books combined with toys and sold as a unit; children's read-along books and pre-recorded tapes sold as a unit; children's story books; coffee table books; coloring books; comic books; comic magazines; diaries; paper gift wrap; graphic novels; greeting cards; printed instructional manuals and strategy guides in the field of computer games; printed invitations; iron-on transfers; juvenile books; magazines in the field of entertainment; non-electronic personal planners and organizers; notebooks; novels for juveniles; paper cake decorations; paper decorations in the nature of doorknob hangers; paper napkins; paper party bags; paper party decorations; paper party hats; paper table cloths; pencil cases; pencils; pens; personal organizers; postcards; posters; puzzle books; read-along books; read-along children's books; reference books in the field of entertainment; reference books in the filed of action/adventure mysteries; school supply kits containing various combinations of selected school supplies, namely, writing instruments, pens, pencils, erasers, markers, crayons, highlighters, folders, notebooks, paper, graduated rulers, series of fiction books; sticker albums; sticker books; stickers; story books; temporary tattoos; trading cards; art prints; animation cells; collectible cards; lithographic prints; original works of art created from paper; photographic prints; printed art reproductions. replicas of props in the nature of paper cut outs in the form of posters featuring printed replicas of characters from movies. FIRST USE: 19840400. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19840400


IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, and headwear. FIRST USE: 19810600. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19810600


IC 028. US 022 023 038 050. G & S: Accessories for use with toy action figures, action type target games; amusement park rides; balloons; board games; card games; cases for action figures; cases for play accessories for action figure, model vehicles and model space craft; Christmas tree ornaments; connecting links for toy building blocks; construction toys; costume masks; doll costume masks; dolls; hand held units for playing electronic games; hi bounce balls; jigsaw puzzles; paper face masks; parlor games; coin operated and non-coin operated pinball machines; play sets for toy model vehicles, plush toys; role-playing toys; stand alone video game machines; toy action figures; toy building blocks; toy model hobby craft kits; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a units; toy modeling dough kits and accessories for use therewith sold as units; toy vehicles; toy weapons; toy model vehicles and accessories therefore sold as a unit; wind-up toys; yo-yos; collectible card games; collectible miniature board games, and toy helmets. FIRST USE: 19820300. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19820300


IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: Entertainment services in the field of film and television, namely, the creation, production and distribution of motion picture films, and videos; providing news in the field of entertainment; entertainment services provided on-line by means of global and local area networks, namely, providing information regarding interactive computer game software, interactive video game software and interactive computer games and interactive video games, all on-line by means of global and local area networks; providing news in the field of entertainment relating to interactive computer game software and interactive video game software over an electronic network; providing news programming in the field of entertainment relating to science fiction over an electronic network; fan club services; and providing interactive computer game software over an electronic network that may be accessed network-wide by network users; and providing online computer games. FIRST USE: 19810612. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19810612
 
Last edited:
I like Agcohn's plan, of just making it "Indiana Jones like". After all, Indy himself was patterned off of old serials from the 40's.
 
The idea is the one Lucas SHOULD have used for Indy 4... :cheesy:

It has all the elements of a good Indiana Jones flick. Nazi's, archaic ruins, ancient religions and a bit of the supernatural. And surprisingly, no talking aliens.

I'm going to keep this close to the chest for now. If I don't do the fan film, I'm going adapt it to an original screen play and get it registered. <---(Dripping with irony). However, if George Lucas wants to steal my idea, all I want is a PA job on the set. Maybe a nice credit too...

I know that Lucas Films has endorsed Star Wars fan fiction, so I wonder if Indiana Jones falls under the same category.
 
George Lucas has always seemed to be fond of Star Wars fan films, and making one is 100% more likely to give you tons of clicks on youtube than if you change the character and make it into a ripoff.
I think you''re better off asking the question at theforce.net or something.
 
I forgot where I read it, and it was the better part of a decade ago so things can change, but Lucasfilm's policy has been that as long as you don't turn a profit (you can make money to recoup costs, but anything else needs to go to charity) and it's not obscene (no Princess Leigh porn), they don't care. As far as they're concerned, it's free advertising. I mean, Lucasfilm holds an annual contest for Star Wars fanfilms (with George himself as a judge).

But if you are dead set on doing an Indiana Jones fan film, contact Lucasfilm's legal department and ask. They will give you the final word on what their policy regarding fanfilms is.
 
But if you are dead set on doing an Indiana Jones fan film, contact Lucasfilm's legal department and ask. They will give you the final word on what their policy regarding fanfilms is.
Either that, or you will get a standard technical reply after three months that you need a lawyer to interpret.

I've had both happen to me.
 
Lucas are famous for suing everyone and anyone for using their trademarks or breaching copyright. Eventually that turned quite a lot of people sour so they started to 'ease up' on the policy allowing fan films and other works of fiction to exist as long as they turn no profit and they don't do something that devalues their products.

It's questionable what would happen if you made a successful fanfilm that actually maintained real quality in acting, story, lighting etc. - legally you'd'nt be able to do shitzels with it, 'cept put it on Youtube and Vimeo, but Lucas could certainly turn that into an excuse for getting rid of a film they perceived as 'too good'...or, if they are smart, they'd negotiate and release it. :-)
 
Lucas are famous for suing everyone and anyone for using their trademarks or breaching copyright. Eventually that turned quite a lot of people sour so they started to 'ease up' on the policy allowing fan films and other works of fiction to exist as long as they turn no profit and they don't do something that devalues their products.
That must have been a long time ago though? Fan films have been huge for ten years now.

The only time I know that Lucas went ape **** during this time was about The Phantom Edit, and that didn't happen until someone mass copied a bunch of discs and handed them out for free outside the Chinese theater on Hollywood blvd. to get Lucasfilm to release Star Wars on DVD.
This was around 2001-2002, when the official word from Lucas was that he wouldn't release ANY of the Starwars films on DVD until they were ALL completed and it would only be in a 6-film box set.
 
The only time I know that Lucas went ape **** during this time was about The Phantom Edit, and that didn't happen until someone mass copied a bunch of discs and handed them out for free outside the Chinese theater on Hollywood blvd. to get Lucasfilm to release Star Wars on DVD.
This was around 2001-2002, when the official word from Lucas was that he wouldn't release ANY of the Starwars films on DVD until they were ALL completed and it would only be in a 6-film box set.

The only other time I can think of was around that same time, Dr. Dre used the THX "Deep Note" at the beginning of a song that, if I remember right, contained offensive language after Lucasfilm denied him permission to used it. But again... there is that whole for profit and demeaning the trademark thing (as well as using it after explicitly being told no).
 
Back
Top