XCheck
Veteran
Hearing this from our friend K., my wife and I burst out laughing. Same people, different times.
The last time we heard this was about two years ago, when K. was instructing his daughter to stay close to him when we were walking in the wilderness of Vancouver Island. You know, kitty=cougar.
This time around, it was K. instructing his two years younger son not to get to close to our cat Fluffy, which is an adult cat that grew up with two kids in the house, which is to say - pretty harmless.
Undoubtedly, K. has the right to conduct his experiment (as he likes to refer to parenting) the way he sees fit. What we laughed about was the exactness of the tone in contrast with the difference between the two situations. What struck me, was the non-discrimination between the real and perceived danger, and the use of words to describe the vastly different animals (even though they are technically cats).
K. is also an avid nature lover (which is one thing that makes us friends), and describes pretty much any activity of mankind as 'an open warfare against nature'. And here it stops being funny, IMO. I think bringing up kids with the idea that "Kitty's gonna get you" contributes to new generations growing up with fear of unknown (the nature), which they want to obliterate when they get a chance. Thus, K. may unwillingly contribute to the very attitudes he criticizes in the human race.
Of course, he sees things differently. There was quite a discussion after the famous words were spoken, and I found the subject fascinating. It might well be that I am dead wrong, so I'd like to hear if anyone has an opinion. It might be a good subject for a future documentary
.
The question is: Is "Kitty's gonna get you" more likely to create a nature lover or a nature loather?
The last time we heard this was about two years ago, when K. was instructing his daughter to stay close to him when we were walking in the wilderness of Vancouver Island. You know, kitty=cougar.
This time around, it was K. instructing his two years younger son not to get to close to our cat Fluffy, which is an adult cat that grew up with two kids in the house, which is to say - pretty harmless.
Undoubtedly, K. has the right to conduct his experiment (as he likes to refer to parenting) the way he sees fit. What we laughed about was the exactness of the tone in contrast with the difference between the two situations. What struck me, was the non-discrimination between the real and perceived danger, and the use of words to describe the vastly different animals (even though they are technically cats).
K. is also an avid nature lover (which is one thing that makes us friends), and describes pretty much any activity of mankind as 'an open warfare against nature'. And here it stops being funny, IMO. I think bringing up kids with the idea that "Kitty's gonna get you" contributes to new generations growing up with fear of unknown (the nature), which they want to obliterate when they get a chance. Thus, K. may unwillingly contribute to the very attitudes he criticizes in the human race.
Of course, he sees things differently. There was quite a discussion after the famous words were spoken, and I found the subject fascinating. It might well be that I am dead wrong, so I'd like to hear if anyone has an opinion. It might be a good subject for a future documentary
The question is: Is "Kitty's gonna get you" more likely to create a nature lover or a nature loather?