I find myself at a crossroads in my filmmaking development. As a student, I feel I have reached the point where my main focus is to develop a good image both in composition and in lighting. However as a student, the budget is not as ample as my ambitions. I have spent a lot of time reviewing the options, weighing the alternatives and the tried and tested standards, and I feel that I have come up with a very interesting question. Why should I use tungsten?
I have spent a lot of time watching the filmmaking that I do as well as that which is done by other students and people on forums like this and I have found that a lot of it is done in mixed lighting situations. The last movie I made was shot on locations that required lighting but involved large amounts of daylight. In these situations I find tungsten lights to be incredibly limited. While I have looked into using gels I have found that geling lights is very difficult and inefficient and geling windows is not financially viable. What I need is something with far more versitility.
In come the fluorescents. I have begun to love fluorescent fixtures, especially those using CFL bulbs. They are powerful, efficient, cool, and most of all very versatile. I am able to use the same fixture with daylight corrected bulbs or 3200K corrected depending on the situation and get very good results. They seem nice, but what is the trade off?
As a low budget filmmaker I don't have the money to drop on professional equipment (frankly its not even an option). DIY is my mantra. Options on creating DIY CFL fixtures seem much more accessible than tungsten. But yet with all these advantages I still feel like I'm doing something wrong. Tungsten fixtures have been used for decades to create many of the films I consider my inspiration. Am I looking at tungsten wrong? I can see how it can be useful for lighting scenes were artificial light is dominant but are they versatile enough to make it easy to light daylight scenes as well without it becoming a hassle? Am I looking at the entire thing wrong? Is tungsten for me?
I have spent a lot of time watching the filmmaking that I do as well as that which is done by other students and people on forums like this and I have found that a lot of it is done in mixed lighting situations. The last movie I made was shot on locations that required lighting but involved large amounts of daylight. In these situations I find tungsten lights to be incredibly limited. While I have looked into using gels I have found that geling lights is very difficult and inefficient and geling windows is not financially viable. What I need is something with far more versitility.
In come the fluorescents. I have begun to love fluorescent fixtures, especially those using CFL bulbs. They are powerful, efficient, cool, and most of all very versatile. I am able to use the same fixture with daylight corrected bulbs or 3200K corrected depending on the situation and get very good results. They seem nice, but what is the trade off?
As a low budget filmmaker I don't have the money to drop on professional equipment (frankly its not even an option). DIY is my mantra. Options on creating DIY CFL fixtures seem much more accessible than tungsten. But yet with all these advantages I still feel like I'm doing something wrong. Tungsten fixtures have been used for decades to create many of the films I consider my inspiration. Am I looking at tungsten wrong? I can see how it can be useful for lighting scenes were artificial light is dominant but are they versatile enough to make it easy to light daylight scenes as well without it becoming a hassle? Am I looking at the entire thing wrong? Is tungsten for me?