is AI gonna take our jobs?

Peter C. said:
I don’t know if the Bible is a good example because many feel it’s a collection of parables rather than a historically accurate document.

Furthest I believe it was written a century after his death. In my view people have been re telling reality since language was developed.
Click to expand...

Def, but I didn't mean like it could be the truth, but how good the quality is and interesting it was to watch.

That's just what I saw then and it was unique and coherent, but it could have been about anything. Here's an action movie. [There's always someone criticizing and it could be valid, but the bigger point is always the lightspeed improvement of what the tech is doing with every new system/model/engine/whatever it is.]

If you walked into a room with this on, you wouldn't think twice about AI.

 
I think the business model that I am hearing about with Netflix & Meta where the platforms are going to offer ad creation to match the program they are shown in is going to be a large financial success. It is one stop shopping avoiding the part of the process (us) that folks know the least about. Plus the idea of on-demand ad creation that is designed to mimic the content it is shown in is pretty unique. This will cement a lot of perceptions if it is good. Given the quality level shown in that Ars Technica article, we are pretty much there now.

I am with NorBro, event production will not take very much of a hit but creative work is in trouble. So to answer the 2022 thread question - yes, AI is going to take (or ruin) a lot of peoples' jobs.
 
NorBro said:
Insane.
Click to expand...
Obviously amazing, but it CURRENTLY suffers from the same problem as stock footage where you can't get a scene with a variety of coverage, the samples are almost always compilations. It's funny AI is better at making images from scratch than staying in the world of an existing image and playing out a scene. Television commercials at some point, as a trend, became compilations rather than wide, medium, close ups etc, IMO mostly because it's less creative (easier) to throw a bunch of situations together. But they were given hall passes because they at least provided pleasing visuals since commercials can quite easily provide elevated production values.

Anyway I'm not saying anyone is safe or "I'm not worried" etc, but at the moment, stringing together full scenes within a contained location or set of characters isn't really its strength. The other thing is the above video sucks - prompting = god or a simulation - who cares? The creator wasn't simply trying to use it to showcase some impressive samples, they were trying still to make a cool video. My point being, the technology doesn't guarantee good results as an overall project.

This has one of the few examples of a scene actually playing out (scene at 04:50)
. Action could be way more forgiving too with many of the details mashing together and getting covered up by things getting shot constantly.

As a viewer, I'd love to watch a full AI feature but am pretty keen to move past the novelty phase and settle into the watching movies as a whole phase!
 
My brain offers about 10 seconds to either accept a video or close it...the AI's work might be right where it needs to be, lol.

I thought the prompting video was very good; not because of any message but mostly because of the dialect and acting/emotions/feelings from the people.

If I saw a commercial or YouTube ad like this for a product I really like, I might consider buying it, something new from the company.

And that will be the point of this for many...make AI videos in seconds, make millions of dollars while saving money on video production/post.
 
Both examples are mind blowing. One has to ponder if any advertising content will be "produced" in a year from now? If the AI is this good now, the tools will just get more precise to control it and get what you want. The thing that strikes me is that AI gets to start at the top from a quality point of view. It does not need to afford the best cameras/lenses/lighting tech etc... It has an unfair advantage of incorporating all of time into its products.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top