bmw1602
Member
I haven't seen much talk around here about IR contamination, there is a ton of it over on the reduser.net forum.
I had to do this test with our RED at work so I brought out my HVX rig and see how it did.......glad I did.
Seeing as we all have 35mm adapters and are seeking a shallow dof, achiving this in the daylight means using various ND filters.
The camera's sensor has a standard IR reflector (aka Hot Mirror) on it. But on a bright day one will typically pile on a lot of ND filtration in front of the lens. Especially when you want a shallow depth of field, after all that's why most people buy a 35mm adapter anyway!
The problem is that standard ND filters block the visible spectrum but not IR. So the effect is to transmit a great deal of IR relative to the visible light, making the IR pollution quite evident. The fix for this is to use a IR reflector (Hot Mirror) in a filter to place in front of the camera lens. Remember, it should always be the first filter in the mattebox so that the IR is reflected out into the world instead of onto the back of another filter.
This will affect different fabrics differently.
So from LEFT to RIGHT. I have SILK-COTTON-NYLON-Polyester.
you will notice COTTON is the most affected while Nylon says black the longest.
ALso a MAJOR factor at play here is the actual DYE in the garment.
This color shift will also affect greens......like grass.
This can be a pain to correct for in POST. In more extreme cases it can almost be not feasable to correct for in post.
SIMPLE FIX.........BUY a IR Filter!!!!!!!!!
Different brands will work better on certain cameras and lenses also have an effect on this.
Tiffen's IR filter reportly works better on the red than the schneider for example.
But any IR filter is better than none.
Fixing this in post is not easy as you might think.
Here a short video of the boring test.
http://vimeo.com/5637250
here some scren shot composites.......(I know, I know I should of been more consistent with my apertures between the before and afters, but you get the point!!!! It's an issue)
Here is the comp sceen shots of the camera with just ND's on it.
Here is the IR version.........
here is a better shot showing each extreme end of the contamination spectrum.
Here is a DIRECT comparison of BEFORE and AFTER the use of a IR filter
ANYWAYS........the conclusion is obvious.........use a freakin IR filter.
Like I said IR contamination also affects other colors!!
I had to do this test with our RED at work so I brought out my HVX rig and see how it did.......glad I did.
Seeing as we all have 35mm adapters and are seeking a shallow dof, achiving this in the daylight means using various ND filters.
The camera's sensor has a standard IR reflector (aka Hot Mirror) on it. But on a bright day one will typically pile on a lot of ND filtration in front of the lens. Especially when you want a shallow depth of field, after all that's why most people buy a 35mm adapter anyway!
The problem is that standard ND filters block the visible spectrum but not IR. So the effect is to transmit a great deal of IR relative to the visible light, making the IR pollution quite evident. The fix for this is to use a IR reflector (Hot Mirror) in a filter to place in front of the camera lens. Remember, it should always be the first filter in the mattebox so that the IR is reflected out into the world instead of onto the back of another filter.
This will affect different fabrics differently.
So from LEFT to RIGHT. I have SILK-COTTON-NYLON-Polyester.
you will notice COTTON is the most affected while Nylon says black the longest.
ALso a MAJOR factor at play here is the actual DYE in the garment.
This color shift will also affect greens......like grass.
This can be a pain to correct for in POST. In more extreme cases it can almost be not feasable to correct for in post.
SIMPLE FIX.........BUY a IR Filter!!!!!!!!!
Different brands will work better on certain cameras and lenses also have an effect on this.
Tiffen's IR filter reportly works better on the red than the schneider for example.
But any IR filter is better than none.
Fixing this in post is not easy as you might think.
Here a short video of the boring test.
http://vimeo.com/5637250
here some scren shot composites.......(I know, I know I should of been more consistent with my apertures between the before and afters, but you get the point!!!! It's an issue)
Here is the comp sceen shots of the camera with just ND's on it.
Here is the IR version.........
here is a better shot showing each extreme end of the contamination spectrum.
Here is a DIRECT comparison of BEFORE and AFTER the use of a IR filter
ANYWAYS........the conclusion is obvious.........use a freakin IR filter.
Like I said IR contamination also affects other colors!!