Into Camera or not

filmelife

Well-known member
Hi guys,

please if someone know this...i'm using the senn 416p going straight into the hvx, is there a quality difference by doing that vs going into the sound devices 302 and then into hvx, and why

thanks very much
 
bwest, thanks for the response please expand...perceived reach

will it sound louder, brighter, the dynamic range is still the same 16bit in the end equalling to approx 96db. are you saying that the 302 will make it 'seem' louder

thanks
 
The 302's limiters will make a significant difference as well. They'll let you record a bit hotter without having to worry as much about incidental peaks or sybillance.

An external mixer will give you more control, as well as a cleaner (ie. lower noise) track.
 
SMuir said:
An external mixer will give you more control, as well as a cleaner (ie. lower noise) track.

yes, by perceived I mean "lower noise" as you turn the faders up to reach someone soft spoken or further away, other preamps also turn up the noise as you amp-up so dialog is harder to perceive.
 
thanks guys, but please bare with me here

we are recording at 16bit 48khz into the camera of course which has a dynamic range of about 96db

what iam trying to ask is.........

1-will the sound devices make the sound seem louder,
2-is the dynamic range higher than the camera,
3-and if so, how will this benefit us since the output of the 302 will be squeezed to the range of the hvx 96db range,
4- where does the 50 and 60 settings of the hvx fit into this rig

please explain, as i wanna buy a 302 but wanna make sure what i'm getting into.

i already spent 3500 on the boom rig. thanks for your patience with me.
 
1- yes, and any high quality mic pre with limiting will do the same job. The limiting means you can set your overall volumes louder and not risk overloading your channels. So everything seems louder without overloading (going into the red and digital blocking/thumping noises). Analog sort of likes distortion (cf. Jimi Hendrix's guitar) but digital, not at all.

2-yes, because without the limiter you have to watch your levels and usually set them conservatively (quietly). Although there's a trick to get around this, which I'll not get into at the moment.

3-you're raising the average dynamic range of the entire recorded take by using a hotter recording level and limiting. The louds will seem louder, the pauses relatively softer.

Think of it as a floor and ceiling in a room. The ceiling is bad (distortion), the floor is bad (noise floor).

If you use a taller room, you can get a taller person in it (hypothetically, of course, standing above but just touching the floor and reaching to just below, but not touching the ceiling). The person can be taller, right? That's your increased dynamc range, one sample.

Now imagine a bunch of people, all different heights. Some too tall, some too short. Your digital people sample, 48000 little people a second.

Well, you can, using a limiter, turn up the volume so all the people are taller, but the limiter shrinks those who are too tall so they still fit.

Now you adjust your transfer to your smaller room (camcorder's dynamic range, adjusted by a commbination of your mic pre's output master level and your camcorder's input levels) so that the people still all fit but the distance between the feet to the floor and the head to the ceiling is less. You can compress the peole too (a la Dolby) but we won't get into that. The average height of all the people is higher. Greater average dynamic range. Everything sounds taller/louder.

4-50Hz is usually for UK/European power, 60Hz for USA power. Television usually takes its sync points from the national grid (the power plug).

I have a much less expensive Beachtek DXA8 with limiter and as I set it up I could literally hear the noise floor dropping away (the hum and hiss disappearing).

Good deal.
(A difference of 6dB is double or half as loud, FYI, so even the $200 Beachtek's 103dB S/N would be over twice as quiet as your 95dB internal preamp.)

HTH
 
The 302 will also let you ride the levels during the shot without having to paw away at the side of the camera.
 
emotepix said:
4-50Hz is usually for UK/European power, 60Hz for USA power. Television usually takes its sync points from the national grid (the power plug).

I think the -50 & -60 setting on the HVX he was referring to was the mic gain level (dBu) not Hz.
The difference with these settings is that the sensitivity will be higher if you use the -60 dBu setting. This setting only affects the mic input of the HVX. When using the SD302 this will be a moot point as you will switch the camera over to LINE input which is 0dBu.
This is also an advantage of using a mixer, as the mic pre-amps of the camera are bypassed. Although the pre's on the HVX are quite good, the SD302 has a lot better quality mic pre's.
 
the -50 and -60 db settings on the hvx should be left at -50.

- 60 is for very insensitive mics and you will tend to clip your pres with any of the common mics you will be using.

so ya, leave it at -50

Get a 302!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Back
Top