First of all, hi to everyone in the dvxuser.com forums, I have been visiting this page for almost two years now and until today I decided to register because I wanted to post a few questions regarding my decision to buy a microphone. (you will pardon my english for I am from Mexico)
Here's the situation: I'm doing a feature length movie for my thesis and have a budget of about 1,500 dollars (excluding camera and mike). Yeah, it sounds ridiculous, but I know how to manage that budget, there are only non-actors, no money spent on locations, just the ocassional prop, gas and food.
I have a DVX100a, a broken tripod, and a mac to edit. But I know I need a microphone and I've looked through recommendations and found that I need a hypercardiod and a shotgun. Most of the scenes are indoors, so maybe I could rent the shotgun ocassionaly, or use the hypercardiod close to the subject.
The problem is I would want the best quality in audio even if the production isn't in that level. I've checked and the Schoeps MK41 seems the best and I would buy it if it was the only instrument I needed, but... is it? First, is it a major problem just using one mic and not getting stereo sound? What is the standard in that? Other is regarding the range, if I have two models apart for about 10 feet, can I get both their voices in a good level? Or is it almost impossible to work scenes with only one mic? For in that case I should buy two, not so expensive, hypercardiods.
Now, regarding quality. Is there really a difference in quality between a Sanken CS-1 and the Schoeps MK41, I know there is, but can a newbie like me notice it? Because that's almost double the price, maybe I could buy two CS-1. Or is there one cheaper in the same range of quality? I've heard of the Oktava, which are 200, would you rather recommend those? What would be the difference between the DVX100a audio, the Oktava and the Sanken? Perhaps I'm just crazy for buying a Schoeps when an Oktava can do the work without a harsh difference? (and I know the project sounds cheap and I should go for the Oktava, but I really don't want cheap audio)
Other thing, if I build a boompole with these instructions http://adamisaak.org/diy/boompole/ would it be stable? I don't mind if its heavy, I just don't want it to make noises. (I still don't understand why a stick can cost so much?) Is the Oktava good for cancelling boom pole noises? I guess the Schoeps would neccesarily mean buying an expensive boom pole.
One more thing, would a AT4073 be equivalent to the quality of an Oktava or would a AT897 do? And what should I expect of their long range sensibility? Would it be coherent to try and get some audio from a distance of 30 feet?
Well, those were my crazy newbie questions. Thanks.
Raul Q
Here's the situation: I'm doing a feature length movie for my thesis and have a budget of about 1,500 dollars (excluding camera and mike). Yeah, it sounds ridiculous, but I know how to manage that budget, there are only non-actors, no money spent on locations, just the ocassional prop, gas and food.
I have a DVX100a, a broken tripod, and a mac to edit. But I know I need a microphone and I've looked through recommendations and found that I need a hypercardiod and a shotgun. Most of the scenes are indoors, so maybe I could rent the shotgun ocassionaly, or use the hypercardiod close to the subject.
The problem is I would want the best quality in audio even if the production isn't in that level. I've checked and the Schoeps MK41 seems the best and I would buy it if it was the only instrument I needed, but... is it? First, is it a major problem just using one mic and not getting stereo sound? What is the standard in that? Other is regarding the range, if I have two models apart for about 10 feet, can I get both their voices in a good level? Or is it almost impossible to work scenes with only one mic? For in that case I should buy two, not so expensive, hypercardiods.
Now, regarding quality. Is there really a difference in quality between a Sanken CS-1 and the Schoeps MK41, I know there is, but can a newbie like me notice it? Because that's almost double the price, maybe I could buy two CS-1. Or is there one cheaper in the same range of quality? I've heard of the Oktava, which are 200, would you rather recommend those? What would be the difference between the DVX100a audio, the Oktava and the Sanken? Perhaps I'm just crazy for buying a Schoeps when an Oktava can do the work without a harsh difference? (and I know the project sounds cheap and I should go for the Oktava, but I really don't want cheap audio)
Other thing, if I build a boompole with these instructions http://adamisaak.org/diy/boompole/ would it be stable? I don't mind if its heavy, I just don't want it to make noises. (I still don't understand why a stick can cost so much?) Is the Oktava good for cancelling boom pole noises? I guess the Schoeps would neccesarily mean buying an expensive boom pole.
One more thing, would a AT4073 be equivalent to the quality of an Oktava or would a AT897 do? And what should I expect of their long range sensibility? Would it be coherent to try and get some audio from a distance of 30 feet?
Well, those were my crazy newbie questions. Thanks.
Raul Q