Some people may remember me from another post, "Will you make crap work if that's what they want?" where I got a pretty thorough talking down and learned a lot. I would definitely say that it opened my eyes a good amount, I learned a lot, and I've been working hard at making good use out of what I've learned. It certainly helped me a lot to put things in perspective.
But I've got another problem. With the same video. They want to pull me off of it now and either can it or hand it to someone else to do. This is what I can't seem to figure out.
It started back in August. Nah, can that, it started back in March of last year. Before our Annual Dinner, I was asked if I could make a video slideshow of the Council's history to play before the dinner. I was just an intern on a stipend, and nobody was expecting much. I did doubletime, came in on weekends, wrote, scored and edited together a whole piece that floored the VP and the CEO. A couple of months later I was brought on as a contractor to do video as a regular paying gig.
In August, they asked if I could redo what I did for the Council for the GPF, a non-profit philanthropy group that the CEO had as a side project. I agreed, and was really interested. I talked about the model for the other video I made (act structure, how to deliver the idea and the content and raise dramatic tension to keep the audience interested the whole way through). This time, the client just completely ignored me and handed me a script that was terrible.
I worked with it and worked with it, and for 2 months, we had meetings and I put out different versions where they would ask me to cut things and put in video of their friends, but they never liked any of it. So my girlfriend and I went in and did what we did for the first video. Came in on weekends, rewrote, scored and completely remade the whole thing from the ground up. We showed it to them. They said it was great, but the script didn't say exactly what they wanted it to say. So they told me to can the script and replace the voiceover with video from the original.
I did, which was where the other thread came in. I felt like :badputer: destroying the whole idea, but I learned from the other thread and I went on. I did what they asked, replaced the script (the heart of the whole piece) with the old video. They watched it, then requested more changes. Cut out more video, add in more friends. Watched it again. Cut out more video, add in more friends.
Now, the Annual Dinner is coming back up. They want to play the video at the dinner, but still aren't satisfied with it. So they brought in a PR firm to manage the dinner and had them watch the video. Then the original. They told me to scrap the entire thing, go back to the original, and cut it to 3 minutes. And so I scrapped all of it, went to the original and cut it to 3 minutes.
The VP came up yesterday and watched it. He looked like he wanted to cry. He asked me what I thought about it. I told him the problem lies with the script, that the approach to the video lacked the compelling footage to make the script work, which was why I had tried rewriting it. He said I had to make it good, that I had to stop making it suck, and then asked if I believed in it. I told him that wasn't a fair question to ask, that I made all the changes they requested, all of the cuts, tossed out every good idea I thought I had and watched all of it get rejected for more video of their friends, and then get put on the spot when asked if I "believe" in the video. I said I will make every change they ask and I will make it look as good as I can, but I cannot overcome that fundamental, foundational problem.
So he told me to cut the beginning, add the other beginning back from the version that I had cut before, move some other clips around and then add in some special effects and graphics, then show it to the CEO, the client and the PR firm. If they don't like it, he's pulling it and telling them the video can't be done.
So, thanks for reading all of this - where did I go wrong? I feel like I really tried my best, and I've learned a lot (especially about the importance of the script - I feel like every time I tried putting something up, it crumbled because that section was so flat and uninspired), but I don't know what I can do here. They're blaming me for it, saying that I made it not work because they didn't like my artistic expression, but I've tried my hardest. I've had 6 different people come in and try directing the video, telling me what to put where and for how long and I've done it all faithfully, but the finger's still getting pointed at me for not making their suggestions work.
What do I do? Aside from :badputer: of course
But I've got another problem. With the same video. They want to pull me off of it now and either can it or hand it to someone else to do. This is what I can't seem to figure out.
It started back in August. Nah, can that, it started back in March of last year. Before our Annual Dinner, I was asked if I could make a video slideshow of the Council's history to play before the dinner. I was just an intern on a stipend, and nobody was expecting much. I did doubletime, came in on weekends, wrote, scored and edited together a whole piece that floored the VP and the CEO. A couple of months later I was brought on as a contractor to do video as a regular paying gig.
In August, they asked if I could redo what I did for the Council for the GPF, a non-profit philanthropy group that the CEO had as a side project. I agreed, and was really interested. I talked about the model for the other video I made (act structure, how to deliver the idea and the content and raise dramatic tension to keep the audience interested the whole way through). This time, the client just completely ignored me and handed me a script that was terrible.
I worked with it and worked with it, and for 2 months, we had meetings and I put out different versions where they would ask me to cut things and put in video of their friends, but they never liked any of it. So my girlfriend and I went in and did what we did for the first video. Came in on weekends, rewrote, scored and completely remade the whole thing from the ground up. We showed it to them. They said it was great, but the script didn't say exactly what they wanted it to say. So they told me to can the script and replace the voiceover with video from the original.
I did, which was where the other thread came in. I felt like :badputer: destroying the whole idea, but I learned from the other thread and I went on. I did what they asked, replaced the script (the heart of the whole piece) with the old video. They watched it, then requested more changes. Cut out more video, add in more friends. Watched it again. Cut out more video, add in more friends.
Now, the Annual Dinner is coming back up. They want to play the video at the dinner, but still aren't satisfied with it. So they brought in a PR firm to manage the dinner and had them watch the video. Then the original. They told me to scrap the entire thing, go back to the original, and cut it to 3 minutes. And so I scrapped all of it, went to the original and cut it to 3 minutes.
The VP came up yesterday and watched it. He looked like he wanted to cry. He asked me what I thought about it. I told him the problem lies with the script, that the approach to the video lacked the compelling footage to make the script work, which was why I had tried rewriting it. He said I had to make it good, that I had to stop making it suck, and then asked if I believed in it. I told him that wasn't a fair question to ask, that I made all the changes they requested, all of the cuts, tossed out every good idea I thought I had and watched all of it get rejected for more video of their friends, and then get put on the spot when asked if I "believe" in the video. I said I will make every change they ask and I will make it look as good as I can, but I cannot overcome that fundamental, foundational problem.
So he told me to cut the beginning, add the other beginning back from the version that I had cut before, move some other clips around and then add in some special effects and graphics, then show it to the CEO, the client and the PR firm. If they don't like it, he's pulling it and telling them the video can't be done.
So, thanks for reading all of this - where did I go wrong? I feel like I really tried my best, and I've learned a lot (especially about the importance of the script - I feel like every time I tried putting something up, it crumbled because that section was so flat and uninspired), but I don't know what I can do here. They're blaming me for it, saying that I made it not work because they didn't like my artistic expression, but I've tried my hardest. I've had 6 different people come in and try directing the video, telling me what to put where and for how long and I've done it all faithfully, but the finger's still getting pointed at me for not making their suggestions work.
What do I do? Aside from :badputer: of course