Hi there,
as part of my actor training, I studied Meisner, amongst other theorists. I had a question for people who have studied Meisner at some point.
What interested me most about my Meisner training was the intense focus on the scene partner. The ensuing repetition exercises were fun and had an almost manic quality or intensity about them. It was fun because the technique got me thinking on my toes, but sometimes I felt Meisner was less good at acknowledging your own cognitions and the wider bits of the scenes, like what was going on outside your scene partner. It almost felt like there was too emphasis or fixation on your scene partner. Sure, reacting is a fundamental part of acting, but I'm sure there are other theories outside that / outside the Meisner experience.
Did anyone encounter the same problem I did with Meisner?
David
as part of my actor training, I studied Meisner, amongst other theorists. I had a question for people who have studied Meisner at some point.
What interested me most about my Meisner training was the intense focus on the scene partner. The ensuing repetition exercises were fun and had an almost manic quality or intensity about them. It was fun because the technique got me thinking on my toes, but sometimes I felt Meisner was less good at acknowledging your own cognitions and the wider bits of the scenes, like what was going on outside your scene partner. It almost felt like there was too emphasis or fixation on your scene partner. Sure, reacting is a fundamental part of acting, but I'm sure there are other theories outside that / outside the Meisner experience.
Did anyone encounter the same problem I did with Meisner?
David