Steve House
Veteran
Your post that we're commenting on said you mix so that peaks hit -0.3dBFS to -0.1dBFS. Was that perhaps a typo in the decimal point placement and you meant to say -3.0dBFS to -1.0dBFS? As Noiz suggested in his mention of overshoot meters, the actual peaks of the waveform can be 2 to 3 dB higher than the levels indicated on a typical peak-reading meter such as the software meters in your editing program. If you're mastering with peaks indicated as you say, you're REALLY trying to send the actual waveform tops all the way up into the +2 to +3dB range, something impossible to do in digital. I think I recall a post where you were suprised the over's indicator was coming on in FCP - no wonder it is. I've never seen any suggestion for web and DVD deliverables that they be allowed to go over -3dBFS and most sources suggest a brick-wall limiter set to -3 be placed at the last stage in the master output bus for DVD and 5.1 broadcast mixes, -10dBFS for TV broadcast stereo tracks. Even suggested maximums as low as -6dBFS for DVD are not uncommon. After all, what is gained by pushing things higher than that in the mix? If your track isn't loud enough for the listener, they can always turn up their playback volume control a little. Seems like turning the knob all the way up to "11" risks damaging the track without actually providing any benefits - all cost, no return - so why do it?I am aware of the various standards for audio levels depending on the station. Locally each station has a different standard, so they just set the levels - they are used to doing it. So I mix for web / dvd levels which is all the way up.
Last edited: