MattC
Veteran
Re: How do you make a feature film?
Thanks for clarifying my point, Stationhouse...
I am in no way suggesting that you blow off spontaneity. But, from my perspective, it is the planning that allows you to be spontaneous (this goes for any endeavor artistic or otherwise). It's hard to think creatively in the moment (right-brained) if you are preoccupied with logistics (left-brained). Now if you are lucky enough to have a dedicated Production Manager and/or Assistant Director, great, let them deal with the logistics. But if you are wearing all the hats, then proper planning will actually give you more freedom, not less. If your shooting on location in NYC and your lamps to all your lights get busted, it will be a pain in the ass, but you'll be ok. If you're filming Blair Witch out in the middle of the woods in Maine, you're screwed. If you've carefully planned out all your shots and can execute them with minimal effort, you can then focus on the performance of your cast, or trying new shots inspired by the location. If, on the other hand, you are struggling just to get the shots done that you need for planned coverage you may find you don't have time to experiment. For any creative endeavor there is a ton of drudge work. Planning reduces the drudge work so that you can be more creative - that's all I was saying.
Also when starting out, we are learning the process of movie making. I didn't do all that work on these quick little shorts because the shorts demanded it. I did it because I'm learning a process that I can then transfer to any project I decide to work on.
Also there is the respect issue (not fear, but true respect). Being a director is essentially being a CEO and while I haven't been a director, I have been a CEO (albeit a small one) for twelve years. People working for you, look to you for guidance and leadership and they expect those things, which are demonstrated by you in not only your vision but your ability to realize it (organizational skills, communication skills, your ability to make intelligent decisions based on a solid understanding of your needs and resources, etc.). Just as in business, everyone understands that creative endeavors, are fluid and that problems will arise. No one will fault you for that. But if you are unable to deal with them both intelligently and expeditiously, or if you bring them about due to poor preparation, they will be reticent to follow. Now in business the weak leader has the added carrot of financial incentives (how many times have you worked for an idiot yet stayed in the job because you needed the money or it payed well?). But the low budget filmmaker does not have this arrow in his quiver, he or she must constantly motivate their crew to perform under less than ideal circumstances. Like a field commander, you have to convince your troops to follow you into battle and stay in the fight. Believe me, they're not doing it for the extra $150 a month combat pay.
Matt
Thanks for clarifying my point, Stationhouse...
I am in no way suggesting that you blow off spontaneity. But, from my perspective, it is the planning that allows you to be spontaneous (this goes for any endeavor artistic or otherwise). It's hard to think creatively in the moment (right-brained) if you are preoccupied with logistics (left-brained). Now if you are lucky enough to have a dedicated Production Manager and/or Assistant Director, great, let them deal with the logistics. But if you are wearing all the hats, then proper planning will actually give you more freedom, not less. If your shooting on location in NYC and your lamps to all your lights get busted, it will be a pain in the ass, but you'll be ok. If you're filming Blair Witch out in the middle of the woods in Maine, you're screwed. If you've carefully planned out all your shots and can execute them with minimal effort, you can then focus on the performance of your cast, or trying new shots inspired by the location. If, on the other hand, you are struggling just to get the shots done that you need for planned coverage you may find you don't have time to experiment. For any creative endeavor there is a ton of drudge work. Planning reduces the drudge work so that you can be more creative - that's all I was saying.
Also when starting out, we are learning the process of movie making. I didn't do all that work on these quick little shorts because the shorts demanded it. I did it because I'm learning a process that I can then transfer to any project I decide to work on.
Also there is the respect issue (not fear, but true respect). Being a director is essentially being a CEO and while I haven't been a director, I have been a CEO (albeit a small one) for twelve years. People working for you, look to you for guidance and leadership and they expect those things, which are demonstrated by you in not only your vision but your ability to realize it (organizational skills, communication skills, your ability to make intelligent decisions based on a solid understanding of your needs and resources, etc.). Just as in business, everyone understands that creative endeavors, are fluid and that problems will arise. No one will fault you for that. But if you are unable to deal with them both intelligently and expeditiously, or if you bring them about due to poor preparation, they will be reticent to follow. Now in business the weak leader has the added carrot of financial incentives (how many times have you worked for an idiot yet stayed in the job because you needed the money or it payed well?). But the low budget filmmaker does not have this arrow in his quiver, he or she must constantly motivate their crew to perform under less than ideal circumstances. Like a field commander, you have to convince your troops to follow you into battle and stay in the fight. Believe me, they're not doing it for the extra $150 a month combat pay.
Matt