How did they do this?

I'd say it was shot at 24fps 1/24 and then slowed down with frame blending on or shot at 60i slowed and then added motion blur. They also used some sort of motorized lazy susan.
 
man...
that's a strange one.
I'm still scratching my head on it.

It looks like they made some stills from the footage and "tweened" them in a few of the shots.

Almost like the movie "Again To Return" posted on this site for LossFest.

a series of photographs that when you tween them, it kind of molds from one shape to what ever is on the next frame.

you can go to 4:40 of this video to learn more about tweening,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWrwlg7N36I


and then some motion blurr and a few other elements added on top of that.
I don't really know!
maybe it's just a program with a plu-in that does that.

I hope someone on here actually knows!
Specially since that YouTube video has no usable info what so ever.
not even comments!
 
twocik23 said:
I'd say it was shot at 24fps 1/24 and then slowed down with frame blending on or shot at 60i slowed and then added motion blur. They also used some sort of motorized lazy susan.
Click to expand...

I second this.

I will experiment and try to recreate it.
Either what Twocik said.

Or Like the other person said about getting frames and tweening somehow between them, which I would say may be the same, i.e. frame blending.
 
jumpthewire said:
I am curious how to get this effect-
Looks like they are using motion blur with slowmotion.

Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVnlGxkjlYM


Shawn
Click to expand...


“Justine Dream Test”
Dieses Video bzw. diese Gruppe enthält möglicherweise Inhalte, die für einige Nutzer unangemessen sein können, und wurde daher von der YouTube-Community gemeldet.
Damit du dieses Video oder diese Gruppe anzeigen kannst, musst du bestätigen, dass du mindestens 18 Jahre alt bist, indem du dich anmeldest oder ein Konto erstellst.


Which means to say, I had to login to my youtube account, and verify that I was over 18... to see totally blurred out female anatomical elements...

Anyway, having done that, I'd say the effect could be a combo of practical effects, such as somesort of 'in front of the lens image warpage', and some form of AE timewarpage, as well as color warpage.

The the image warpage could also be done in AE, but I think it would just be faster with a pratical method.
 
When you do cut out animation you actually take four frames in a row. The you move the cut out objects a little and take four more frames in a row. That is why cut out animation is a tad bit jerky. Edius does have a strobe effect that can hold 3,4, 5 frames in a row. You could set it to hold 2 in a row and then add motion blur key framing the direction of the blur over time. I think that is all they did. FCP might have all the filters to do it. In other word the strobe effect would play frame 1 and hold it over for frame 2. Frame 3 would play and hold that frame image for frame 4. You could render out the footage at 15 FPS and then import it back in to a 30 FPS timeline to give some what of the same effect. I admit it might be youtube causing some of the look.

It almost seems like she is on a motorized sit and spin as well.
 
Last edited:
After going thru it a couple more times, it hit me... this experiment is definitely inspired by the movie 300.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top