Help me with this Deffered Payment Contract

capitalP

Veteran
I'm heading into production in a month on a Feature. You know the rest, no budget and so on. I'm using non SAG actors, but I want to make sure if by some chance the film ends up making money I pay them for working on Deffered payment. I need help on rephrasing paragraph 4 in this sample contract below. I don't want them to recieve any percentange or future payouts if the film makes money, I just want to pay them a flat rate of $100 a day for the time they spent on the production.

And I know a lawyer would be wise, but since this is not a major production just out of pocket money, there's no risk of much, just want to make sure the actors are covered if the film makes a little money. Rather have them work on a contract then me just giving my word... any help?



ACTOR AGREEMENT

This agreement is entered into by and between Tom Cruise (the “Actor”) and Miramax (the “Production Company”). In the event of the Actor’s death or total incapacity, “Tom Cruise” means the Actor’s heirs, devisees, beneficiaries, trusts, assignees or other successors-in-interest. “Miramax” includes the licensees, assignees, future owners, or other acquirers or successors-in-interest of Miramax, Inc.

The Actor hereby grants to the Production Company and to its licensees, assignees, and other successors-in-interest, all rights of every kind and character, in perpetuity, in and to the Actor’s performance, appearance, likeness, name and/or voice (the “Performance”) in connection with the motion picture entitled Vanilla Sky which is based on the concept and outline by Vanilla Sky(the “Picture”).

The Actor hereby authorizes the Production Company to photograph, videotape, film and record (on film, tape, or any other medium), the Performance and audition(s) for the Performance; to edit the same at its discretion and to include it with the performances of others and with sound effects, special effects, digital effects and music; to incorporate the same into the Picture, trailers, posters or other materials or programs related to the Picture; to use and to license others to use such records and photographs in any manner or media whatsoever, including without limitation unrestricted use for purposes of publicity, advertising and sales promotion; and to use my name, likeness, voice, biography or other information concerning me in connection with the Picture and for any other purpose associated with the Picture. The Actor further acknowledges that the Production Company owns all rights to the Picture.

The Production Company shall compensate the Actor for the Performance by payment to Actor of ___% of net profits to the Production Company from all distribution and exploitation of the Picture (including Picture trademarks, service marks, logos, slogans, likenesses, names, voice, or dialogue), including royalties, dividends, or payments of any kind arising from theatre, television, video, CD, DVD, or internet distribution and exploitation. Net profits shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Payment will be made to the Actor on a quarterly basis in perpetuity as the Production Company receives such monies. The Actor is responsible to pay all applicable taxes and other assessments or levies of any kind due on the receipt of income.

Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Production Company, the Actor will receive no compensation in the event that the Actor does not complete the Performance.

This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement by and between the Actor and the Production Company and supersedes any and all prior contracts, understandings, negotiations, and agreements with respect to the Production Company and the subject matter hereof, whether oral or written.

Actor Name: _____________________________________

Signature: _____________________________________





_________________________________
, Production Company
 
I'm not a lawyer, but I have done contract work in my day job. Replace the beginning of paragraphy four with this:

The Production Company shall compensate the Actor for the Performance by payment to Actor a sum equal to $100 per day for each day the Actor physically works on the production of the Picture. All payments will be deferred and paid from net profits...

Just make sure you keep track of the days the actors actually work on the film. Have them fill out a time sheet and sign it for each day they are on set.
 
No, you would want each actor to sign their own seperate contract. If you have everyone sign the same contract you could get into some serious issues with class action lawsuit if one of the actors end up suing you.
 
:) I modified my second question which was regarding to your answer, oops..didn't think you would see it.

Ok. I'll do that. While I have your attention, look at Paragraph 1 & 2, right after Tom Cruise.. I wonder if "Means the Actor's heirs" makes sense...? And...

I'll just PM you..
 
mjjason said:
What constitutes making money?

Good point. The minute the pay is determined upon "profit" the contract is really just a "good faith" document. For small indy productions the possibility of "profit" is easily buried under a million billable hours of the producer.

To that end unless the exact business plan and breakdown of expenses is part of the aggrement, the contract is will have little value to actually collecting any money if the picture is sold.

If you want to guarentee a fair payment to actos and crew the most secure method is to start an LLC that owns the movie and make cast & crew owners of that LLC. That way (if &) when the movie is sold each owner will get a cut of that sale instead of a cut of what ever scrapes might be left after the producer takes out all his expenses and potentially infinate work hours.

I am not saying you don't have a good faith plan to pay everyone but that a contract that involves "if the movie makes a profit" is almost completely worthless as a legal document.

Cheers
 
Doesn't Hollywood frequently screw people over with a more sophisticated version of this same situation?... a movie may gross something like $40m worldwide and yet they can still lose the profit in the clouds or something?


I'm not criticising you here... I'll probably use this same contract info myself in the future... and I'm glad you guys are talking about it on here.

I'm just saying that in the past I've negotiated a package rate to do sound on a project... and then the producers came back to me with a proposition for a back-end deal "that will be worth twice the pay of the front end deal"... and naturally I took the up-front money which was less, but guaranteed... up-front.

Back-end deals are scary for everybody but the guy who makes the contract.
 
The reason I'm mainly doing this deal with my actors is pay them just in case, because they are willing to work on the project with no pay, but since it's a feature film with long hours, I just want to make sure if I make money from this they do also.

But the chances of anyone making money is probably slimer than Nicole Richie, but hey you never know.

Basically it's either this agreement or non at all and have them work for free, which they are more willing to do because of the experience... keep in mind this is not a major production with backing involve, if it was then lawyers would be involve and such.
 
I meant nothing bad towards you or the contract... I was just kind of laughing about this kind of agreement in general... from the no-budget indi all the way up to a pretty big budget Hollywood deal.

Back-end gross deals are great... back-end net deals are scary.

I deal with local actors under the same pretense as you have described... where we think somebody has a good idea and we'll all just do it for the heck of it... it's all good man. I can relate. I understand that contracts like these are good faith ways of telling your actors that you appreciate them and it creates a sense of "ownership" for everybody involved...
 
I
The Production Company shall compensate the Actor for the Performance by payment to Actor a sum equal to $100 per day for each day the Actor physically works on the production of the Picture. All payments will be deferred and paid from net profits...
t.

Shouldn't it be "Gross proceeds" instead of "net profits"? Net profits isn't fair for the actors....

(I want to do a short on points too and don't know how make up the release...)
 
I'm not a lawyer, but I have done contract work in my day job. Replace the beginning of paragraphy four with this:

The Production Company shall compensate the Actor for the Performance by payment to Actor a sum equal to $100 per day for each day the Actor physically works on the production of the Picture. All payments will be deferred and paid from net profits...

Just make sure you keep track of the days the actors actually work on the film. Have them fill out a time sheet and sign it for each day they are on set.


What happens if you have four actors sign this deal (meaning you owe $400 in deferred payments) and the film makes a net profit of $300?

Also, what is a typical % to use if you choose to do it that way?
 
Doesn't Hollywood frequently screw people over with a more sophisticated version of this same situation?... a movie may gross something like $40m worldwide and yet they can still lose the profit in the clouds or something?


/QUOTE]

Yeah - it's called the AGR, Adjusted Gross receipts. It's the money the films make less the off-the-tops. Which, up until a few years back could include anything. So many films never "made" anything. And people never got paid anything extra.

Typically points are distributed off the net of the film not the gross. You could also run the deferments on the Post Actual Break Even point of the film. Which would be a percentage of the AGR less the Actual Break Even.

There are about ten different ways of doing a deffered payment. It depends how you want to split it up.
 
Would it not just be easier to pay your actors $100 a day, run a tight shoot and just factor that cost into the production of the movie? That way if the film DOES make a profit you can just keep the margin and move on.

It just seems to me that while deferred payment is an option, it would be infinitely easier to just pay them upfront (especially if you feel you could really make your money back plus some).
 
It would if wanting to be up front about low/no pay. Deffered is just a clever way of getting free work. Nobody goes into it really anticipating money later on. By this, a contract for no money is a mute point.
 
Back
Top