After quite a bit of digging, I think I got to the bottom of the inputs for the H4N, much of the information comes from this post.
It seems that the XLR part of the connecter is at -60dBm whereas the phone part is at -10dbM. For a line input of +4dBm, the guy who wrote that article uses an attenuator of -15dBm on the phone part. This video shows someone using an attenuator of -60dBm for the XLR part. That all adds up and makes sense. The XLR is for microphone input the phone is for instrument input.
I'm not so clear on what is happening on the H5. It's advertised as accepting line-input from mixers, etc. It has a pad of 20db which can be applied to the inputs. Does this imply that the XLR and phone part have the same rating? How does the rating compare to the H4N.
Also, the H5 has further 3.5mm input which is advertised as for use with either microphone or line input. How is that possible without attenutation?
These are the specs of of the H4N
These are the specs of the H5
It seems that the XLR part of the connecter is at -60dBm whereas the phone part is at -10dbM. For a line input of +4dBm, the guy who wrote that article uses an attenuator of -15dBm on the phone part. This video shows someone using an attenuator of -60dBm for the XLR part. That all adds up and makes sense. The XLR is for microphone input the phone is for instrument input.
I'm not so clear on what is happening on the H5. It's advertised as accepting line-input from mixers, etc. It has a pad of 20db which can be applied to the inputs. Does this imply that the XLR and phone part have the same rating? How does the rating compare to the H4N.
Also, the H5 has further 3.5mm input which is advertised as for use with either microphone or line input. How is that possible without attenutation?
These are the specs of of the H4N
These are the specs of the H5