scorsesefan
Veteran
I'm planning on shooting a doc about alternative schools on my fx6. I already own a Tamron 28-75 2.8 and a Sony 24-105 f4. Would these two lenses suffice or should I add a third lens? Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, I think you are lacking at both ends of the focal length spectrum. If it was me, I'd want at least a 20mm prime for interior classroom/hallway shots. Some people, such as Sam, might even argue you need a 16mm or wider. But for me, I almost never shoot wider than 20mm.I'm planning on shooting a doc about alternative schools on my fx6. I already own a Tamron 28-75 2.8 and a Sony 24-105 f4. Would these two lenses suffice or should I add a third lens? Thanks
Ok, thanks, Doug. I was thinking of selling my 28-75 and picking up a 70-200, as that focal length is already covered by my 24-105 and the lack of OIS is a bit of a pain on the fx6....Actually, I think you are lacking at both ends of the focal length spectrum. If it was me, I'd want at least a 20mm prime for interior classroom/hallway shots. Some people, such as Sam, might even argue you need a 16mm or wider. But for me, I almost never shoot wider than 20mm.
In addition, I'd also need something a lot longer than 105mm. I'd recommend a 70-200mm f/2.8 for getting in tighter on individual students, a teacher at the front of the classroom, etc.
I'd leave the 28-75 at home. You're already more than covered by the 24-105, and the difference between f/4 and f/2.8 won't be worth the time it takes to change lenses.
I wish Sony offered IS on their mid-range zooms the way Canon does because optically they're great...Out of all the lenses I own, the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lens is my favorite. Just a really great-looking lightweight lens that perfectly covers the focal length range I like best. With the exception of wildlife and a few other things were I need super-telephoto, I could easily get by just with my 24-70 and 70-200 for 99.9% of everything I shoot.
Yeah, kids are pretty exhausting to film. I've been practicing filming my nieces, but a whole classroom of kids will be different.I've shot in classrooms before and I'll just second Doug's excellent advice: you are absolutely going to want the reach of a 70-200mm (in addition to the wider lenses).
Maybe you already know this, but action in schools moves pretty fast. You can get by with changing lenses so long as you're deliberate and purposeful and not trying to do it to get a shot. By the time you've changed the lens the kids have moved on to five different things.
A second shooter would be ideal, although I realize that may not be realistic.
All the more reason to have a long lens. I like to be able to shoot people from a distance without being in their face -- which always totally ruins the dynamics. After a little bit, they forget you are there and don't really know where you are aimed. Plus the compressed DoF and narrower compostions helps focus the viewer on the action I want them to see.Yeah, kids are pretty exhausting to film. I've been practicing filming my nieces, but a whole classroom of kids will be different.
Do you ever use clear image zoom?All the more reason to have a long lens. I like to be able to shoot people from a distance without being in their face -- which always totally ruins the dynamics. After a little bit, they forget you are there and don't really know where you are aimed. Plus the compressed DoF and narrower compostions helps focus the viewer on the action I want them to se
Thanks, Peter. I think it's down to your filming philosophy. Some like to lay back and observe from afar and some like to get in and interact a bit more. The school I'm planning on filming is a an alternative school, so I guess I will need to see how formal the classes are and how much I'll be allowed to move around and interact with the students...I've filmed many educational docs but I have a differing opinion. I think the 24-105 is fine. There's nothing wrong with the 70-200 but what I don't like about it's often too long for classrooms and draws attention. I prefer to be able quickly switch between wide and long, I don't want to be changing lenses. Too me its capturing special moments that only last a few seconds. Everyone has their own style so do whatever you like.
I find for education the wide is more important for capturing student teacher interaction. I prefer being in the mix. When you're close with a wide it feels more immersive where as telephoto from the corner is a detached observer. Once students get involved in the activity they'll forget they are being filmed which is when you get your best shots.Thanks, Peter. I think it's down to your filming philosophy. Some like to lay back and observe from afar and some like to get in and interact a bit more. The school I'm planning on filming is a an alternative school, so I guess I will need to see how formal the classes are and how much I'll be allowed to move around and interact with the students...
So, do you think 24mm is wide enough?I find for education the wide is more important for capturing student teacher interaction. I prefer being in the mix. When you're close with a wide it feels more immersive where as telephoto from the corner is a detached observer. Once students get involved in the activity they'll forget they are being filmed which is when you get your best shots.
On a full frame I think it's good enough where as 28 isn't.So, do you think 24mm is wide enough?
Yes, on the fx6. I think the 28-75 I'll use for sit down interviews to get a nice shallow DOFOn a full frame I think it's good enough where as 28 isn't.
Thanks, great tip!One non tech tip if you have a plan you can film more effectively. If you do an interview first with the teacher, you can follow up by filming those things that illustrate whats in the interview.