Richard J. Johnson
Joystick Member
Man I hate that look.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do it in some kind of Mr. Plinkett persona.
This comment got me to thinking about this guy's "Phantom Menace" review. So, I Youtubed him and caught myself riveted by his "Avatar" review. He really is a master. Does anyone know his 'true identity?' Is he a film professor? Manager at a local Blockbuster? Process Server? I.T. guy? Roofer?
I sometimes wonder if we should look at 1920x1080 transfers of old films, because the creators had never seen the material at such a high resolution, not while creating it, not in projection, mostly it was 500p or less through production and release. It shows production flaws they never thought we would see. It's like examining a work of art on the microscope. The creator had no control at that level. Not fair![]()
Since films were until recently cut on flatbeds, uprights, or benches and test-projected at their native resolution - which is substantially higher than 500 lines - I'm not sure what you're driving at, there...
I have a 50 inch Plasma samsung tv. You can turn it off, u just have to reach for the remote control and press the right button.i have a 55 inch LED samsung tv. You can turn it off, u just have to dig through more menus. it's in picture options.
Yup. Hockey games look great as well.These high Hz settings are for fast action sports etc. Watch a HD football match at 200Hz and youll see why its so good.
These tvs do not have to be viewed this way. There are settings (simple I might add) to switch. When I first got my latest bravia i watched a bit of a movie with full motionflow and it looked ridiculous. Switched back to OFF and lovely film motion.
I sometimes wonder if we should listen to Beethoven's music with the volume on, at least the stuff he wrote after going deaf.I sometimes wonder if we should look at 1920x1080 transfers of old films, because the creators had never seen the material at such a high resolution, not while creating it, not in projection, mostly it was 500p or less through production and release. It shows production flaws they never thought we would see. It's like examining a work of art on the microscope. The creator had no control at that level. Not fair![]()
I sometimes wonder if we should listen to Beethoven's music with the volume on, at least the stuff he wrote after going deaf.
Not fair either.![]()
Sure, total control. Except for the fact that he couldn't actually hear it.He had total control on the composition and that's what counts, right?
Sure, total control. Except for the fact that he couldn't actually hear it.
I'm not dissing Beethoven, I'm just saying it's a valid analogy.
TV's are for watching television. Projectors are for watching movies. :evil:
If that was true, a field monitor wouldn't be enough to have on location. You'd need an entire movie theater.A better analogy IMHO would be Beethoven in his early years, producing a CD, but only being allowed to monitor the recordings on low rate mp3 on the speaker of his mobile phone. He could be furious on the mistakes he would discover in the performance. I believe that happens a lot to those who see their work on a 1080p release. We do know that the 3:1:1 1440x1080 HDCAM generated some discussions in the make up departments.
If that was true, a field monitor wouldn't be enough to have on location. You'd need an entire movie theater.
If the quality of your movie relies so heavily on getting the focus sharp enough, exactly when you want it, the equipment isn't your biggest problem.