Loki
Veteran
I just sat through so many crappy short films today..
it blew my mind.. my school holds a film festival every year to show the work the students have done in their fifth term.
15 months at this school.. and the moronic people here still have yet to think..
"hey.. we are NOT shooting this for tv... it is going to be projected digitally... so lets shoot 60i!"
ugh... all the digital films looks liked pieces of ****.. if just one person had said to themselves.. lets shoot progressive.. they would have doubled there resolution.... and none of these films implored any form of de-interlace methods...
they all looked like a muddy mess of bland washed out colours and out of focus piles of junk. With any wide shot... especially in DV you need all the res you can get...
moving on... the films that were actually shot on 16mm and 35mm looked just as bad... someone must have decided to do an awful telecine transfer.. then do an even worse MPEG2 compression..
to me.. it would just seem logical to rent a 16mm and 35mm projector for the day the festival took place and run the actual cut film... would have looked immensely better.
Sorry.. I am just venting.. I expected much more care from the students at my school.. I didn't expect to see the shlock that I did.
note: not saying all the films sucked, about 80% of them did.. but the other 20% were quite well done, technical gripes aside.
visual presentation is part of the experience.. somehow people forgot that.. sitting through a nice looking bad film is at least better than sitting through an awful looking bad film..
end rant.
EDIT: I'd have to say, the things produced on this website are far superior to the garbage I witnessed. The People here inspire me more than any school. word.
it blew my mind.. my school holds a film festival every year to show the work the students have done in their fifth term.
15 months at this school.. and the moronic people here still have yet to think..
"hey.. we are NOT shooting this for tv... it is going to be projected digitally... so lets shoot 60i!"
ugh... all the digital films looks liked pieces of ****.. if just one person had said to themselves.. lets shoot progressive.. they would have doubled there resolution.... and none of these films implored any form of de-interlace methods...
they all looked like a muddy mess of bland washed out colours and out of focus piles of junk. With any wide shot... especially in DV you need all the res you can get...
moving on... the films that were actually shot on 16mm and 35mm looked just as bad... someone must have decided to do an awful telecine transfer.. then do an even worse MPEG2 compression..
to me.. it would just seem logical to rent a 16mm and 35mm projector for the day the festival took place and run the actual cut film... would have looked immensely better.
Sorry.. I am just venting.. I expected much more care from the students at my school.. I didn't expect to see the shlock that I did.
note: not saying all the films sucked, about 80% of them did.. but the other 20% were quite well done, technical gripes aside.
visual presentation is part of the experience.. somehow people forgot that.. sitting through a nice looking bad film is at least better than sitting through an awful looking bad film..
end rant.
EDIT: I'd have to say, the things produced on this website are far superior to the garbage I witnessed. The People here inspire me more than any school. word.