Field moniter

sodotoguwangus

Well-known member
Okay, when shooting high-def video, focus is critical. This is where a good field moniter (such as the marshall) will come in handy. That much I understand.

However, I have no problem achieving razor-sharp focus using the camera's focus assist and sharpening. I don't need a moniter to focus. What I want to know, is how well field monitors reproduce colors.

When I shoot something on the HVX and look at the LCD or viewfinder, sometimes the footage looks good, sometimes it doesn't. But when I get home, and watch the footage on my TV, the colors look completely different than what I thought I was getting.

3 questions: How do you accurately judge what kind of colors you are getting when on set (especially if you are using custum scene files, where color has been tweaked?) Will a good field moniter let me accurately judge the colors I am getting? And why is it that professionals prefere B&W viewfinders, when there is no way to judge color?
 
A good, calibrated, field monitor should be about as accurate as anything short of a true CC refrence monitor. The Marshall is the best deal for the money, the next best tool is the Pany BT-LH1700 it's the 17" LCD which has a waveform for exposure control as well. If you really have money to burn I'd get the BT-LH900, which is a 9" version of the 1700. $4000 though. Once calibrated either of the Pany LCDs will be very accurate, the Mashall will be good enough but not perfect.
 
I just compared my trusty 8" sony 8045 SD monitor to the 17" Panny HD. Color looked virtually identical to me, though Barry suggested it would not because of different color space between HD & SD. I didn't see it though.
 
Back
Top