Holy Harry
Well-known member
Maybe dumb question... but let's see what you guys think-
I've been shooting a few weddings lately and to my shock and horror... I actualy like the work! So I'm planning to push that side of the business a little harder.
I've established a pretty good workflow using my HVX with a quickly interchangable manfrotto tripod and monopod and a couple of smaller cameras on light tripods. I can move fast with this setup.
The only thing I'm not happy with so far is when I need to move with my camera in a flowing Steadicam style. I don't aim to shoot steadicam a lot, but would like to have it looking well when I do. I've tried finding balancing point on my tripod and walking smoothly etc, but it's only ok.
So here's my question...
I'm using FCStudio. I could upgrade to studio 2 and use it's smooth-cam fx to calm down my small number of slightly shakey "steadicam" shots, or I could buy Shake and use pretty much the same function. When you factor in all the other benefits of owning either of the two, which, if any, would provide a practical solution to the situation? Or should I just go buy one of the cheaper steadicam devices mentioned here? (I'm against that option to be honest, as it means more equipment to haul around)
:dankk2:
I've been shooting a few weddings lately and to my shock and horror... I actualy like the work! So I'm planning to push that side of the business a little harder.
I've established a pretty good workflow using my HVX with a quickly interchangable manfrotto tripod and monopod and a couple of smaller cameras on light tripods. I can move fast with this setup.
The only thing I'm not happy with so far is when I need to move with my camera in a flowing Steadicam style. I don't aim to shoot steadicam a lot, but would like to have it looking well when I do. I've tried finding balancing point on my tripod and walking smoothly etc, but it's only ok.
So here's my question...
I'm using FCStudio. I could upgrade to studio 2 and use it's smooth-cam fx to calm down my small number of slightly shakey "steadicam" shots, or I could buy Shake and use pretty much the same function. When you factor in all the other benefits of owning either of the two, which, if any, would provide a practical solution to the situation? Or should I just go buy one of the cheaper steadicam devices mentioned here? (I'm against that option to be honest, as it means more equipment to haul around)
:dankk2: