Colione
Active member
Hey Guys,
Months and Months ago, upon reading some of the manual for print to tape playback, I read that '2:3:2:3' offers a higher quality, I changed my playback settings to try a 2:3 playback. After that I tried printing a few sequences to tape and I got an error "This computer may not be fast enough to playback sequence with a 2:3:2:3 pulldown". (I'm running a single 1.8 G5, but that's not the issue) Anyways, so I changed my playback settings to '2:3:3:2' and every time I print to tape I get the same error "This computer may not be fast enough for a 2:3:2:3 pulldown".
Does this happen to anyone else? Shouldn't a G5 be able to handle playing back a 2:3 pulldown? Wouldn't 2:3:3:2 give you better quality playback as you are able to drop an extra judder frame?
Any info would be ... interesting!
(my computer plays back and I can print to tape using 2:3:3:2 ... but the error keeps popping up ... so everything works fine, I'm just curious.)
Thanks!
Months and Months ago, upon reading some of the manual for print to tape playback, I read that '2:3:2:3' offers a higher quality, I changed my playback settings to try a 2:3 playback. After that I tried printing a few sequences to tape and I got an error "This computer may not be fast enough to playback sequence with a 2:3:2:3 pulldown". (I'm running a single 1.8 G5, but that's not the issue) Anyways, so I changed my playback settings to '2:3:3:2' and every time I print to tape I get the same error "This computer may not be fast enough for a 2:3:2:3 pulldown".
Does this happen to anyone else? Shouldn't a G5 be able to handle playing back a 2:3 pulldown? Wouldn't 2:3:3:2 give you better quality playback as you are able to drop an extra judder frame?
Any info would be ... interesting!
(my computer plays back and I can print to tape using 2:3:3:2 ... but the error keeps popping up ... so everything works fine, I'm just curious.)
Thanks!