Westminster Productions
Member
I have used Vegas since v4.5, and have been the greatest Vegas evangelist the world has ever know, until 8.1...
I would have to say Vegas 8c was the best NLE in 32 bit guise the world has ever seen, but we don't live in a 32 bit world anymore, and Sony has stuffed up their product by being stubborn. I am so grateful I demo'd 8.1 before buying. I had high hopes that they would have corrected the problems (all to do with codecs) in 9, but it is worse. I'm sure if you are only going to work with Sony cameras and Sony codecs, it will rock, but who can afford to work like that?
It use to be Vegas would gladly accept anything you put on the time line. Then Sony decided that Panasonics MXF isn't good enough and we had to get something like Raylight to get it on the time line...
I have had enough of their nonsense.
I am switching to Edius. I have only been impressed with it as an editor, but my concern is this. I work more often on commercials and film now days, and I do all my effects and compositing in Fusion, so I'm not to fussed about whether Edius is good at that or not, but is it going to cut the mustard when it comes to 10bit uncompressed 4:4:4 HD or bigger. the Red footage is 4k. Will Edius be able to work with it, once it's on my hard drives?
I have the AJA Xena 10 bit codecs on my machine, and Vegas 8 worked with them. Will Edius also work with them?
The Grass Valley white paper on Edius codecs mentions that the HQ+ codec is due for release, and that could allow full uncompressed HD RT editing. Does anyone know more about this?
(http://desktop.thomsongrassvalley.c...gy/whitepapers/cc_ediushd_whitepaper71545.pdf)
This is very important, as I will need to make the change soon. I cant keep on with 32bit Vegas. It just takes too long at the moment. I would appreciate any opinions and comments on this.
Like the stuff that forms in the corners of your mouth, that's the Squirly Luke.
I would have to say Vegas 8c was the best NLE in 32 bit guise the world has ever seen, but we don't live in a 32 bit world anymore, and Sony has stuffed up their product by being stubborn. I am so grateful I demo'd 8.1 before buying. I had high hopes that they would have corrected the problems (all to do with codecs) in 9, but it is worse. I'm sure if you are only going to work with Sony cameras and Sony codecs, it will rock, but who can afford to work like that?
It use to be Vegas would gladly accept anything you put on the time line. Then Sony decided that Panasonics MXF isn't good enough and we had to get something like Raylight to get it on the time line...
I have had enough of their nonsense.
I am switching to Edius. I have only been impressed with it as an editor, but my concern is this. I work more often on commercials and film now days, and I do all my effects and compositing in Fusion, so I'm not to fussed about whether Edius is good at that or not, but is it going to cut the mustard when it comes to 10bit uncompressed 4:4:4 HD or bigger. the Red footage is 4k. Will Edius be able to work with it, once it's on my hard drives?
I have the AJA Xena 10 bit codecs on my machine, and Vegas 8 worked with them. Will Edius also work with them?
The Grass Valley white paper on Edius codecs mentions that the HQ+ codec is due for release, and that could allow full uncompressed HD RT editing. Does anyone know more about this?
(http://desktop.thomsongrassvalley.c...gy/whitepapers/cc_ediushd_whitepaper71545.pdf)
This is very important, as I will need to make the change soon. I cant keep on with 32bit Vegas. It just takes too long at the moment. I would appreciate any opinions and comments on this.
Like the stuff that forms in the corners of your mouth, that's the Squirly Luke.