Edirol R-44 For Live Performances

percoplus

Active member
You should have seen me last night videotaping a band. I had a Zoom H4n recording 4 tracks from onboard mic and 2 condensers attached. I had an M-Audio Microtrack II accepting a stereo line feed from the house board, and a camcorder also recording sound. Don't worry it was not a paying gig. I guess I was just testing my own limits. I had no mixer, so I alternately plugged my headphones into each recording unit.

Needless to say, it was rather chaotic. I went home with no idea what I had. Having way too much on my plate, on one set, I forgot to push the record button a second time to bring it out of standby. I did this on both the Microtrack and the H4n, not realizing it until after the set was over. I did the same on the camera for half of the first song.

The Zoom would not accept line level input from the board. The Microtrack did with lots of attenuation. The Zoom recorded the mics well, especially its own onboard mic. The headphone amps are so weak, I could not tell if my audo was good or not, especially with the loud live music. It's great that the Zoom can record 4 channels, but not good if you can't tell which is which. You could not control anything independently if you did. On both hand-held units, just about everything important is buried in some menu. Not good in a high stress environment.

Why am I self-aggrandizing and sounding like such a fool? All to make the point that saving a few dollars on equipment is not worth it if you cannot operate it with confidence. Since I usually work alone, and operate one or two cameras, my audio capture has to be very user-friendly and reliable.

I am not ashamed to say that I need equipment that requires little thought to operate. I need one unit that I can plug everything into and control. I need switches and knobs, not menus. I need blinking lights to warn me of things. I need to be able to troubleshoot quickly. I need to actually hear something in my headphones other than mush.

I first considered a field mixer, but that would not help me if I wanted to preserve multiple tracks. The only mixer with 4 ins and 4 outs costs $3 grand, and I still need a recorder. After much input on this and other forums, maybe a mixer is not necessary, so I narrowed down to the R-44 and maybe the Tascam DR-680.

I appreciate any further input. Especially any negatives about the R-44, as I don't see any yet. I am also working on a laptop based solution. I have a firewire interface, MOTU 8Pre, just no laptop yet. I am a startup business and will add personnel at some point, but I need to get everything working first. I need to get through a gig without something going wrong. Thanks for sharing my pain.
 
I hate to be the one to point out the Emperor's new clothes, but audio will NEVER be a situation of set it up and forget it while you run the cameras, if your objective is recording anything better than a scratch track. You can't expect to shoot good pictures without giving constant attention to framing, focus, and exposure, I'll never understand why people think getting high quality sound is any different. In fact, many people feel that it's actually HARDER and needs closer attention to get good sound than it is to get good video. At some point you're simply going to have to abandoin the idea of working as a one man band and team up with someone who can give the sound their full and undivided attention. In terms of busget, it's not at all unusual for the "sound department" to represent equipment costs running a number of times larger than that of the "camera department." For a startup, you will be further along in the game spending $5000 on sound and $1000 on a camera than you will be spending $5000 on a camera and allocating $1000 for sound. On the bright side, technology advances have made ameras essentially disposable with a useful professional life of maybe 3 years. Sound gear is definitely a long-term investment and a 20 year old used Schoeps mic will sell for almost as much one brand new in the box.
 
Last edited:
I see that good sound equipment will long outlive any cameras I have, and I don't mean to belittle the sound department in any way. Man, you guys are sensitive! As I said in my post, I don't plan on staying a one-man shop. Regardless, working alone or not, in a high stress environment nobody has time to fiddle with complicated and unreliable equipment, and bloody menus.

Even though I am working a camera, my headphones will be plugged into the recorder (or mixer if I have one) hopefully set up right beside me. I can just imagine being able to reach down without looking, feeling for the right knob, and adjusting - all without taking my eye off the camera.

Remember, when I record a band in a club, there usually is a soundman controlling the mix so I don't have to deal with that minutia. I just have to make sure I can handle whatever kind of signal he or she feeds me, and keep it from clipping. In some cases, all I really need is a vocal track. The rest I get from my ambient mics.

I wish I could just set up my stereo pair, plug them into the house's main board and let the sound guy create a total mix for me. ...and record it, too! I can promise he won't be bored. He can control stage lighting and security as well. That wouldn't be too much to ask. Lol!

Seriously, I just need to be as flexible as possible with my equipment, while maintaining a small footprint.
 
The only way you're going to be able to 'set-and-forget' your sound is to hire someone to do it for you.

The venue sound guy is trying to do the best possible mix for the room. That is guaranteed to require a very different mix that what would be ideal for an album/video project.
 
I see that good sound equipment will long outlive any cameras I have, and I don't mean to belittle the sound department in any way. Man, you guys are sensitive! As I said in my post, I don't plan on staying a one-man shop. Regardless, working alone or not, in a high stress environment nobody has time to fiddle with complicated and unreliable equipment, and bloody menus. ...

Seriously, I just need to be as flexible as possible with my equipment, while maintaining a small footprint.

Didn't think you were belittling sound and no offense was taken. Just felt you needed a little reality check is all :) And I certainly agree with you about unreliable equipment, microscopic buttons, and endless menus to wade through, all reasons I don't trust the inexpensive compact consumer recorders.

Sometimes it helps to work one's perceptions backwards when trying to establish reasonable expectations. Take a look at a well done broadcast concert - say an airing of PBS's "Austin City Limits" or some of HDNet's "Sunday Concert" series. Pay particular attention to what mics you see on stage, how they're positioned, etc. You'll probably notice that virtually every instrument, every guitar cabinet, every vocalist has at least one mic and in many cases several. A lead vocal with an acoustic guitar may have one mic on a stand for the voice and one or even two covering the guitar. Notice also how close they work the mic - in many cases their lips are in actual contact with the screen on the mic. A drum kit might have a full kit of 7 to 10 or more mics for the broadcast sound. Many of those mics are not for the FOH audience PA system but are specifically for the broadcast audio - the drum kit with 7 mics on it might not even have one mic for the concert venue. Now HDNet shows up at a concert venue with a semi-trailor truck full of sound gear - literally - and you're certainly not going to be able to do that out of your own pocket. But study the principles involved and think about how you can adapt them to your scale of operations and what equipment and manpower you'll need in order to do that.

FYI, monitoring for levels and clipping on 'phones is virtually impossible. That's why good mixers and proper recorders have nice big, easily seen, calibrated meters with adjustable ballistics. The cans are for qualitative monitoring - did a mic drop out, is there a buzz, is the lead singer balanced against the backing singers, that sort of thing. When it comes to setting levels they're incredibly unreliable
 
Last edited:
OK, as a professional audio engineer and a professional videographer I can say that the R-44 is a good choice, and the DR-680 may be better if you need more than 4 channels recorded. Yes it's good to monitor your audio closely as it records, but there is a point where you can reasonably leave it alone and still shoot video. To say, "audio will NEVER be a situation of set it up and forget it while you run the cameras, if your objective is recording anything better than a scratch track." is an absolute that simply is not true, especially if you can be close enough to the recorder to keep your headphones on. At the moment I have an R4-Pro, and have recorded both live concerts as well as plays & musicals, while running a camera and not had any issues, or missed any shots, and got paid well. But the key for me is to be near the recorder, with cans on. I get a board feed + a stereo mic(NT4) for live music and it works great (The R-44 will do line level by turning the trim down to 0). Or for a play I put the stereo mic in the center front of the stage, just above the floor, pointing up, and 2 more mics at left/right of the stage pointing up & inward. That gets decent coverage.

And with live music, once the band has played a rockin' song, and you've set your levels to that, you are fairly good to go. YES IT"S BETTER TO WATCH THE LEVELS. BUT, when recording in 24 bit, you have a good amount of headroom that allows you to set the level lower without adding noise, and you have limiters for the occasional transient that goes beyond the clip threshold.

If you want to run around with no headphones on, you get what you get, and you don't throw a fit... There are wireless solutions to get your headphones untethered, so at least you can make your way back to the recorder...

So the R-44. Nice and clean 4 tracks. You'll need a battery pack or an outlet, as 4 channels of phantom will suck your batteries dry in 2.5 hours if you're lucky. One really cool thing is that there is an Oade Brothers modified R-44 for like 30.00 more than the stock version. It puts in new preamps that are dead silent. They have one for music and one for dialogue. I suggest the "Concert" mod R-44 for you.

R-44 Oade Bros Concert Mod
http://www.oade.com/mm5/merchant.mv..._Code=EDR44CMGND&Category_Code=EDIR44-Concert

Right now I'm torn between this and the DR-680. I have written Doug Oade about doing a mod for that, but he hasn't had enough interest yet. The DR-680 is getting nice user reviews so far though. I'd check tapersection.com for thoughts by the audiophiles.

If you use your gear wisely you can minimize train wrecks and distorted audio, and still run a camera. If you have more than one camera angle to shoot, then you just take the wide shot next to the recorder and let the other guy run around. I have yet to have a distorted second of audio, or a missed shot while running both, so it can be done. Just prepare and be aware.

One more thing: Until you get your 4/8-track recorder, remember to push RECORD twice on those Zooms!!!!
 
Thanks Chadfish. I just dropped Doug an email.

Nobody in town has the R-44 or the Tascam for me to look at before ordering. By comparing the two online, the Edirol looks more user-friendly with those four wonderful knobs staring me in the face, but the Tascam can do more tracks. If the Oade mod makes a substantial difference, I would definitely lean that way. I need all the help I can get.

My current setup is thus: I have two Shure KSM-27 condensers for room sound. I mix those with whatever I can get from the house. That covers the four tracks on the R-44. If I wanted to add another stereo mic at some point, I am stuck unless I could plug it into one of the cameras' XLRs. BUt then I am in the same predicament I'm in now. Or I can forget the house feed altogether. I'd hate to do that because I really need a good strong vocal track.
 
Percoplus, here's a user review on the DR-680.



I wish it had 6 knobs too. Still I'm considering it for all the lovely tracks. I know it will probably sound pretty good as is, but I like the idea of modding the pres to get the silent audio I am used to. The guy said the 680 takes one menu and a button push to change the track the knob is assigned to. I don't know if you can have that set up to where you can just push one button after recording has begun. You could write Steve and ask him how hard it is to switch on the fly.

So are you roaming with your camera or on a tripod?

One small request: Could you please ask Doug Oade to do a mod for the 680? I have asked a couple of times, but if he gets some more requests it will keep it n his mind enough to actually (maybe) do it! Thanks.
 
Yeah, I saw that video. The thing looks like a clock radio I used to have. Pretty fragile, too.

If I have both cameras, I can set up any number of ways. I like to have one on tripod and roam with the other - maybe even get on stage, but then I can't do sound. Sometimes I'll have both on sticks right next to each other, one wide and one CU. With another shooter, the possibilities are endless. If I am alone with one camera, I'll do a combination of tripod and roaming. Maybe do a set of each.

I mentioned to Doug that I was also looking at the Tascam.

You have the R-4 Pro. What does it offer above the R-44 besides timecode?
 
You have the R-4 Pro. What does it offer above the R-44 besides timecode?

Nothing. Well, there is the 80 gig hard drive, which is cool, but also heavy. You'd have to record a lot of stuff to need all that space before you unload the files. I think a 32 gig SD should be just fine, and it comes with no card I believe. The R4Pro is a 2/3 bigger than the R-44. I don't own the R-4Pro, but it's been in my possession for 2 years, as it's for my work at a marketing agency. It sounds pretty nice. The R-44 has the same pres as the Pro, but the R-44 has combo jacks, so you can get a 1/4" jack in there. I ordered an R-44 for a film crew on a indi feature I'm audio consultant / post mixer on, and my crew said it worked great. I did play with it a bit, and it's fairly small (smaller than I expected) and lite.

Man I wish there was an R-88 with 8 tracks!
 
So the R-44. Nice and clean 4 tracks. You'll need a battery pack or an outlet, as 4 channels of phantom will suck your batteries dry in 2.5 hours if you're lucky. One really cool thing is that there is an Oade Brothers modified R-44 for like 30.00 more than the stock version. It puts in new preamps that are dead silent. They have one for music and one for dialogue. I suggest the "Concert" mod R-44 for you.

I need to decide if the mod is worth voiding the manufacturer's warranty. It looks like a solid piece of equipment. And no moving parts - what could go wrong?
 
You could put the wrong power supply into your R-44 and be without AC power - they have a reversed polarity sleeve on the connector that is proprietary. But most likely nothing will go wrong.
 
And I would have to attach a supply of AA batteries for phantom. I'll sleep on it and make the call tomorrow. Thanks
 
You can run the R-44 on the 4 AA batteries it takes, but if you don't have an outlet you will run down the batteries in a couple of hours unless you have some sort of battery pack. There is extensive talk about the R-44 and the Oade mod at taperssection.com. It's a great unit, and the Oade mod is just icing on the cake.
 
Hi Guys,

I'm in a similar dilema - I wanted to know if u know what the main differences are between the Tascam DR-680 and the Edirol r-44.

I know one has 4 channels and the other 8. On the tascam can you split tracks on the fly or do you have to stop and then record again. Also, while its recording - can you adjust the volumes for each track or do you have to stop recording to adjust the levels?

Which in your opinion is the better of the 2 (the tascam is an extra £130 in the uk - is it worth the extra money in your view)

Sorry i'm just stumped at the moment which to buy - my purpose is purely audio recording - no video.
 
How many tracks do you want to record at once? Go with the one that fits that need. Remember that the DR-680 is mostly a 6 track, with sp/dif input for 7 & 8. You would need a mixer with a sp/dif out to get mics onto ch 7&8.
 
well i currently record one channel and want to definately record more..6 would be plenty so i'm thinking the dr-680 is more suitable..

I'm just wondering about build quality and line/mic level control. Some one was saying once it is recording you can't adjust volume/levels...is that true?
 
I would PM Steve Oakley with build quality questions. He made the video I posted earlier. Also taperssection.com has a lot of people talking about both units. I think the DR-680 will be fine, though I haven't used it yet. I want Doug Oade to do a mod on it like he does for the R-44 - to make it dead silent, which is good for recording quiet music or nature stuff. But for general use it seems fine right out of the box.
 
just updating this, I have been thinking about upgrading from Zoom H4N. I have recently recorded from board into Edirol R-44. Fabulous machine. You can check out board feeds at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Av_Yl25X0 for an example. Any failures with the mix where board issues. No room mix added. Very silent preamps. Crank this up if you doubt it.

No need to mess with this during the shoot. I was present at the sound check and worked it out with the board master. I turned it on at concert time and directed four cameras. I never looked at it again until the end of the first half.

I don't have a Tascam HD-P2 to compare, but would like to know if it's the equal of the R-44. I would love to get the TC for the price.

Oh, I also use a mixpre whenever I can. I don't believe in mixing in the recorder.

The right choice would probably be to just buy the SD recorder or the Edirol. Quality speaks louder than marketing.
 
Back
Top