DVX accessories for the Undead

Phirewind

Member
I am about to start equipment purchases for work on an indie film project within the next 6 weeks, and need to make a few budget-concious decisions on the inital "stuido" setup.

The film is going to be a action/comedy "zombie" flick, feature-length, shot entirely in 24p 2:3:3:2 with intent to distribute on DVD and transfer to film for theater viewing. It's more for fun than any planned profit, but we don't want to sacrifice quality if we don't have to, and want to use the equipment for profitable projects in the future. We are admittedly amateurs, but are willing to work at learning, and not technically inept. I'm a lifetime software developer and tech geek, and if you require proof of geek magnitude: www.clan-flare.org/files/lightsaber.mpg (shot with Sony Digital8, edited with Premeire, After Effects, Photoshop for hand rotoscoping old-school Lucas style)

While I am beginning to grasp many of the more sophisticated concepts, I would prefer some more professional opinions before we commit cash on hand.

The DVX100A is our camera of choice due to massive feature-set and picture quality for price range, specifically 24p w/ 2:3:3:2 pull-down (thanks for the excellent tech info on this site, I understand it now). It has become apparent that we are going to be forced to spend another $800+ (ouch) on the anamorphic lense, and I am definitely buying the guide as soon as my Paypal account works again...

Anway, here's my short list of hardware, please help me out if I'm missing something essential (very possible) or am pointing at something that will do more harm than good:
a) DVX100A
b) Anamorphic Lens adapter
c) Audio Technica AT-897 shotgun mic
d) extra battery (recommendation?)
e) tripod
f) ONE brand of high-quality DV tapes (recommendation?)
g) looks like I need a Mattebox, but have to admit that it makes my brain hurt to pay $400 for a squared cone made of velcro, especially when I have a cardboard version that fits (blasphemy, I know). The only question is filters. I'm sure someone willl (and should) tell me that I need X, Y, and Z filters that fit in ABC mattebox around my panoramic lens adaptor... probably just gonna have to clench my teeth and take the $1,500 hit like a man.

When recommending hardware, remember that I will be shooting 24p advanced, anamorphic widescreen for maximum resolution, so it will have to work in those conditions (or please give me an alternative)

For editing, I have a PC, but am planning on aquiring a laptop to handle a lot of on-site work. My target is the Toshiba P25-S676, with a 3.4 Ghz P4, up to 2 GB RAM (I'll probably have to go with 1 GB), 80 GB hard drive, 128 MB nVidia GFX 5700 graphics card (excellent for a laptop), and DVD-burner. I can always add firewire hard drives later. I plan to use the laptop as my VTR in real-time as much as possible. When shooting indoor still or small movement shots, both the camera and the laptop will have their power cables plugged in, and the video will be recorded directly to the laptop with the camcorder's mechanical heads never having to turn a single rotation (it's how I recorded the lightsaber clip on an older 1 GHz p3 Toshiba). A 17" wide-screen monitor will sure beat the viewfinder for showing the project leaders what's being shot. Before we get into huge hours of usage, however, I will get a low-end MiniDV cam for playback to PC. Of course, any recommendations for "cheap-but-won't-eat-your-quality-or-tapes" camcorders would be greatly appreciated, as well as any other hardware that I'll need.

Finally... here's the big flame-bait question that I will try to tone down with requirements: What software?
a) 24p 2:3:3:2 capture, editing, PLAYBACK, and back to DV tape.
b) capture live from camcorder without the camcorder actually recording to tape. (If the old $100 Studio DV can do this, surely a $2000 software monster can)
c) special effects: Green-screen, CG video overlays, color correction, particles, and text/titling of course, all to match the film look and framerate/exposure.
d) Export to DVD, and in prime condition for transfer to 35mm film.
e) require no proprietary hardware

What I read about Avid Express has me a bit confused... do I have to have additional hardware in my machine to use the 24p framerate for editing (isn't that Mojo?)? If so, that pretty much scraps the idea of using it for laptop editing.

I have been watching videos and reading tutorials on Discreet's Combustion 3.0, and saw on the system that I was allowed to play on that it can create 24fps projects. I don't know if it's a capture engine, but it looks awesome for compositing effects and just about everything else. If anybody has experience using 24p footage from the DVX in Combustion, please stand up. :) I haven't seen anything that seems to compare to it's power for special effects mentioned in FCP or AVX, or Vegas... I'm trying to keep my development environment as simple as possible, because I may end up being able to use a room full of PC's for editing if I find something affordable and friendly enough that I can train some monkeys (pc gamers playing movie extras) to do some of the more mundane visual review jobs.

Anyway, sorry for the huge post, and thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

Ok so here we go.

-Don't get one extra battery, get at least 3. TRUST ME ON THAT.
-If you want to use the Ana adaptor you'll need the Chrosziel Mattebox. Cinetactics has a soft version coming out, but I don't really like that stuff, because you have to sacrifice too much when it comes to filters.
-Get some sort of stabilizer, even if it's just the Glidecam 2000, it can produce some great shots with practice.
-As for the software, I use Premiere Pro, which I love. And as you appear to be a fellow Adobe afficianato, it streamlines with their other software so well.

I'm sure I'll think of more later, and others will chime in with other good recomendations.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

If you are really, REALLY going to take your project to film, you may NOT need the anamorphic adapter... it depends on whatever service house is doing the conversion to film. Some of them can easily deal with the annie adapter, some prefer to have you shoot in 4:3 and frame it with a 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 in mind, which they will add in post.

This will immediately bring up the question of how do you kinow what is in frame, and what isn't, if you shoot 4:3. There are other threads here which address that problem.

You should start researching who you'll want to deal with. Alas, there hasn't been enough discussion on this forum to cover that topic yet, and 2-pop.com is defunct. In other words, if you are going to film, the choice of who will do the conversion for you is one of the most critical decisions you will have to make. How do you decide? Shoot some test footage, hook up with various conversion companies, and get them to send you some samples of their work with your material. Most of these places should be willing to do it for free, because if you pick them, it is a pile of money to them. Each should be able to recommend optimal settings for your camera which will result in the best possible conversions.

The user MichaelP in the Avid forum on this site probably has the most experience with this process, and he is very helpful, if also very busy. Lurk over his posts and learn wisdom.

If all this sounds like too big of a commitment, maybe you want to do a music video or commercial or two, post 'em here, get good criticsm, then tackle the bigger project. It might really make a big difference for you.

Good luck, and whatever else happens, shoot and learn as much as you can, and welcome to our obsession!
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

I echo Speedbumps recommendation about the ana adapter.  Use the dough saved for a top notch tripod/head (Sachtler, Miller, Vinten) the advantages of a true fluid head will more than pay for themselves down the road.

The better matteboxes have slots/trays for filters. It is difficult to stack thread-on filters without vignetting. Chrosziel is the one I have and while not cheap, it is certainly robust and well worth the additional expense.

Check out the audio forums as you may also find you need a fishpole (mic boom), mixer and possibly a wireless xmitter/reciever combo.  

Also consider a lighting kit, I use Arri's  (150's up to 600's) and they are terrific.  The camera is only one of many ways you will have to spend wads of cash on yours (and mine) obsession.   Oh don't forget to have a very large hard drive on your computer.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

If you know you're going to film, shoot film in the first place ;)

In all seriousness though - I wouldn't think that there would be a post house that would prefer a 4:3 soft matted image to a 16:9 anamorphic.

They'd likely up-rez your footage to HD before printing to film, and HD is natively 16:9 anyways. I suppose that if they went to a 2K image sequence rather than HD, then 4:3 might be *as* convenient for them, but I would really not think that they'd PREFER a 4:3 master. When you're on a big screen, you need all the resolution you can get, and it is a fact that properly focused 16:9 anamorphic footage looks considerably better on large screens than 4:3 matted footage does.

When we have as little resolution as DV to begin with - every pixel counts...
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

check out the cavision mattebox... it is not the most expensive but still pretty good...
you'll be happy with it once you get past the "loose screws" and figure out how do get the wonky rotating filter tray to work right.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

You know, just thinking here, if I ever get the opportunity to shoot for the big screen, considering it will be my first time and I want it to look the best, I just might shoot film (either that or rent a Cinealta). 8)
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

A transfer from DV to film ends up costing about the same amount as it would have to have shot film initially - so if you know going in that you'll have the resources to print to film, just SHOOT film! :)
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

Well, we're not going to film immediately, it's just a later target, but we want to have the image quality and cinematic look of the 24p widescreen for DVD release, which will then probably go nationwide on a small scale via our contacts with LAN gaming centers.  The resources to print film may or may not show up, but I figure if we get into good shooting and editing habits now, it can only benefit us down the road.  Not to mention the clean use of DV editing software vs. conversions to and from analog material.  The question then is, is it worth the anamorphic pain in the arse (and budget) for DVD material.  I was under the impression that it definitely is.

The point for us is to make our development, shooting, and editing as direct as possible, so that I can focus on the effects rather than the equipment.   As soon as I get the basic camera, we'll start experiments with digital effects, to see what money we can save on makeup by using post to digitally add some of the more gruesome tones and organic effects.

TC, the Glidecam 2000 with body mount looks like an excellent idea, thanks.  As for the Chrosziel mattebox to fit the ana lens... $1700... freaking ouch.  It looks a lot like one of those "you don't have any other choice" pricing routines.  I'll let you guys know if my manufacturing friends (pro cad drafters, metalworkers) decide to make something more stable than carboard.  Maybe I'm just a newbie whining, but I just can't get my head around the idea that the thin metal and plastic box around the lens can cost more than the whole electronically and mechanically complex camera itself (well, if you include the brackets, other mounts, and the "followfocus").

Speaking of accessories again, here's a question that's gonna make me believe I just GOTTA have another toy... what is a "follow focus"?  I got an idea, but I wanna be sure...

also, any other comments on 24p editing software and DVD output?  I noticed there's a forum category on here for just about everything except Discreet's products, and didn't know if that was on purpose, or just because Combustion/Flame/whatever are not widely-used products yet...  I loved the live review capabilities I had recording directly to laptop from my Digital8, and want to reproduce that as well.  Thanks again, you guys have been great.  Feel free to laugh with and/or at me and my lightsaber (see above) if you need a work break. ;)
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

I liked the light saber stuff alot actually, it was very well done. I'm thinking about taking a crack at it one of these days. On to more pressing matters...

A follow focus is a mechanism that basically move the focus ring to the side of the camera, allowing for easier access, and most of all it comes with a little white plate around it that you can mark off with a marker, for doing focus pulls, and easier racked focusing. You can also add what is called a whip to the ring, making it even more accessible, especially if you have a focus puller.

I have no idea about Discreets line of NLE, nobody ever talks about it.

I love zombie flicks.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

I purchased Combustion a few months ago but haven't yet had a chance to really get into it. Can't say I'm a big fan of the interface so far, and have found it quite counterintuitive (To be fair, however, I haven't yet run the tutorials... hope they help).

As far as I know After Effects and Combustion are pretty evenly matched in terms of compositing and effects capabilities (I only went with Combustion because I wanted the re:vision warp and morph plug-ins that come included with it), they just use different approaches to their interface.

Combustion does include Re:vision's warp and morph plug-ins if those are important to you (I think they cost around $600 separately), while AE includes Synthetic Aperture's Color Finesse color correction plug-in (around a $460 value).

Note also that Combustion 3 runs slower on a Mac than a PC, which I guess won't be a problem for you, given your PC-based system. Just something to keep in mind.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

TC, if you like, msg me and I'll dig up the info on the technique I used. It's been a couple of years so I'd have to remind myself some of the minor details.

Stas, I agree about the first impressions of Combustion's interface... makes by head swim when I start it up and just push buttons. I need to start off with a simple project goal and work my way through the features. The built-in paint system and effects compositing engine is pretty awesome, though. The demo I saw of it looked far far better than anything I saw while working as an Adobe reseller, but then again Adobe pretty much figures either you're going to by Premiere because, well, it's friggin PREMEIRE, or you're not, and they don't really care 'cause their profit is in $250,000 document servers (which I may end up installing as a consultant... ugh) I'll let you guys know if I manage to make good use of it, and post some samples.. I got a couple of weeks I can spend time playing with it, just gotta get motivated again.

It's tempting to do the project in standard 4:3 to avoid some of the costs... but anamorphic widescreen just looks so much better.

One thing nobody's touched just yet... what kind of filters should I be slapping in front of that anamorphic lens? I've got the idea behind ND and polarized lenses, I think... color temperatures are still a bit foreign to me. I'm used to programming in 32-bit RGBA values, not using a thermostat. ;)
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

Take a look at your shooting schedule and make sure that it's going to be worth buying all the gear. You may be able to get a rental deal and avoid tieing up too much money into all the equipment.

Do you have a sound field mixer and boom in your budget?
Lighting gear?
Grip gear?
etc.

Tape- Panasonic MQ tapes are the recommened ones from Panasonic.

Effects - most editing programs offer basic effects but specific programs like After effects offer more control and better handling. Any effects package can deal with 24fps. Effects are an art unto themselves.
Effects software and many editing packages have demos available. Download them your self and check them out. Take any pro demos with a grain of salt.

Just make sure you're not biting off more than you can chew. (feature film, new camera, new editing software, sound, new effects software) Consider making a short film or shooting a few scenes to make sure you and the rest of the crew are ready,
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

The schedule isn't set yet, but the investment is definite because this isn't our only project. The equipment will also be used for video training, advertisement, and possibly other short films, even a local consulting service (not much like that in my area). And we anticipate the shooting to take several months, since most of our crew will only be available on weekends. Actually, this isn't something that's totally new to me, just on a grander scale and shooting for higher quality, so I'm trying to approach it as if it's all new so I don't miss the small stuff.

A mic boom is definitely a must-have... suggestions for lighting gear would be great. A bit of home depot/ghetto style lighting is probably in order, but I might be able to direct some of the budget at a specific item if it's worth the money for our project. I anticipate a few green-screen shots, several dark outdoor shots, dark and bright indoors, with very few bright outdoor daytime scenes.

Suggestions for commonly-needed grip gear for a single-cam filming?

The rest of September is probably reserved for hardware and software research, through downloadable demos and visits with friends who have various packages. I wanna touch it all, and find that magical place between the interface I can understand and the power I need. October will be used for test shots and initial digital effects testing. I've done a few effects in the past, a green-screen, rotoscoping hand-drawn effects, some color correction... I just can't wait to get my hands on something that will give me that clean image quality that is so vital for efficient fx editing.

I will also be posting samples as I go, and taking notes on the equipment and setup... I know I'm not the first to ask these questions, but maybe it'll help future suckers, er, videographers to have a step-by-step example of going from zero to zombie in 12 simple steps... give or take a few hundred complicated steps.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

As far as lighting gear goes, head over to the lighting forums and read some feedback on the britek lights. They're pretty reasonably priced, and they work really well. I bought a couple of 600's with softboxes and barndoors. They were great on my last shoot. You'll pay a little more than you would for Home Depot lights, but they have much better control and are worth the extra money if you have it. Also, rostronics.com offers a discount (5%?) to members of this forum.

As far as filters go, the dvx already has ND filters, so you're probably good there unless you want a couple ND graduated filters to get that nice deep blue on the sky. A polarizer is a must, for most ppl anyway, and as far as colored filters go, it's pretty much up to what kind of look you're after. However, I will say that you can simulate with pretty good effectiveness the look of most colored filters in post, in my experience anyway. Getting a couple fx filters, like black and white mist, etc, could be useful. You could always order the filter test dvd off of this website. They put together a great set of examples to let you compare different filters, all shot with the dvx.

Last thing on the filters...you might want to check into getting an 85 filter if you're going to be shooting outdoors. The reason is that ppl have reported that the dvx has the worst signal-to-noise ratio (bad grain and electronic noise) in sunlight and the best in tungsten lighting. People have reported great success with putting an 85 filter on the front and white-balancing through it for daylight shots. It really helps get rid of some of the noise, according to some people. Might be worth checking into for a lot of exterior shots...

Hope some of that helps!

Ryan
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

any specific recommendations on which filters (Brand/model favorites if you have any) to put in front of the anamorphic lens?
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

I happen to prefer Tiffen or Schnider 4x4's. I also have a 85 thread-on for those rare exterior situations without a mattebox just to protect the lens. Once you stick a filter in front of the lens, it becomes purely a personal taste issue.
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

Couple O Comments.

First, re: Combustion 3. Yes, this product can easily handle 24p or frankly any other frame rate and interlace/progressive combo you want to throw at it. It is hideously powerful, but with this power comes a price. It's got a pretty hefty learning curve, and a good book and a weekend of playing with the stuff will go a long way.

Combustion also can do basic capture stuff, and editing as well, but it does not claim to be a capture and edit program: you really should do both of those tasks in something like Final Cut Pro. Once you get your footage in, edit it, and like your rough edits, you can export to Combustion using either a piece-by-piece export or something fancy like Automatic Duck's C3 import (which is way sweet, but kinda pricey).

Combustion IMO is the tool of choice for post-production FX & color correction.

Your mic choice is a good one: I have a lot of luck with that mic on a simple boom.

Next, you might want to consider your lighting carefully: it tends to be overlooked, somewhat expensive, and in the end is critical to the final look of your piece. No amount of post-production will save a poorly lit scene.

Last, I second Ryan's suggestion about some filters: a polarizer is fantastic and I recommend a Soft FX 1/2 or 1 or even 3 to give a nice, soft, "film-esque" look. If your zombie flick wants to be harsh, disregard this advice. ;)

Good luck!
 
Re: DVX accessories for the Undead

I'm going to have to dissagree with the "not needing an anamorphic adapter". If you even have the most remote inkling that you could transfer to film, use the anamorphic adapter. That additional 33% of resolution is far better than anything you could get from shooting full frame and cropping in post. We just shot a "theatre etiquitte" short this weekend that will be blown up to 35mm for a local theatre. It was a long one day shoot, but I am greatfull for the anamorphic adapter and the extra resolution that it provided. It does take longer to shoot with, and you will want an external hi-res monitor, but the results are worth it. Again, shooting with film would be ideal, however, there are some editing tricks that we wanted to implement in this short that would just not be convinient with working with a film telecine and paying for the conversion for that.
Also if you get the adapter, or rent one, buy barry's guide, it is an absolute must, and having the actual focusing measurments handy saved us a lot of time.
 
Back
Top