I have both footages (720p25) in my hands, so I tried to see which would compress faster.
Theoretically, DVCPRO HD is intraframe and should thus compress faster, so I had expected to see DVCPRO HD clip get the task done earlier. Note that DVCPRO HD has higher bit rate than XDCAM EX though (50Mbps vs 35Mbps).
Anyway, I did 3 compression tests:
1. Real world settings using both Flip4Mac to WMV
2. Real world settings using Compressor to DVD
3. Switch the two footage and compress to WMV
To have a more accurate comparison, I also switch the footages (both 30s) in both formats. To explain myself more clearly, the original XDCAM EX footage is an outdoor scene at a park. The original DVCPRO HD footage is an indoor scene of my bedroom. So by switching, I mean I copy the outdoor scene into DVCPRO HD sequence and indoor scene to XDCAM EX sequence for my 3rd test.
The test results? Under all 3 tests, compressing XDCAM EX sequence was faster by 15 to 30 seconds.
It seems to me that when it comes to compression, it is faster using XDCAM EX.
Theoretically, DVCPRO HD is intraframe and should thus compress faster, so I had expected to see DVCPRO HD clip get the task done earlier. Note that DVCPRO HD has higher bit rate than XDCAM EX though (50Mbps vs 35Mbps).
Anyway, I did 3 compression tests:
1. Real world settings using both Flip4Mac to WMV
2. Real world settings using Compressor to DVD
3. Switch the two footage and compress to WMV
To have a more accurate comparison, I also switch the footages (both 30s) in both formats. To explain myself more clearly, the original XDCAM EX footage is an outdoor scene at a park. The original DVCPRO HD footage is an indoor scene of my bedroom. So by switching, I mean I copy the outdoor scene into DVCPRO HD sequence and indoor scene to XDCAM EX sequence for my 3rd test.
The test results? Under all 3 tests, compressing XDCAM EX sequence was faster by 15 to 30 seconds.
It seems to me that when it comes to compression, it is faster using XDCAM EX.