Hi all,
I've got a question about the degree of change in the overall image with a 35mm adapter on and off the camera.
I'll be shooting a feature this summer with my XHA1 and Letus 35 Extreme. Since I don't have much of a budget, I'll be working mostly with available light. About a third of the scenes will be night exteriors, and with the Letus on the camera, I know it'll be almost impossible to get adequate exposure in low light.
So, what I'm thinking is...
To keep the adapter on the camera for the shots where I can safely use it to capture better images (sufficient light, sharp focus needed etc.), and to take it off and use the XHA1 native lens for the shots where it'd be safer not to use it (insufficient light, tough follow focus etc.).
However, I'm concerned that if I use the adapter for some shots, and the native lens for others, the finished film won't be seamless and the final cut will look like Jackson Pollock.
E.g. Will the difference in the image be big enough, that the audience, watching the film on a blown up screen, will be able to tell in which shots the adapter was used, and which shots it wasn't?
I'm aware that the inherent quality of the image will change with the difference in DOF and all, but I'm interested in knowing HOW MUCH it will change and whether or not it'll be noticeable. I'll be doing a lot of color correction in post, so I'm hoping that'll help to hide the difference in image quality and make it more seamless?
Feel free to shed some light if you have any thoughts. Cheers!
I've got a question about the degree of change in the overall image with a 35mm adapter on and off the camera.
I'll be shooting a feature this summer with my XHA1 and Letus 35 Extreme. Since I don't have much of a budget, I'll be working mostly with available light. About a third of the scenes will be night exteriors, and with the Letus on the camera, I know it'll be almost impossible to get adequate exposure in low light.
So, what I'm thinking is...
To keep the adapter on the camera for the shots where I can safely use it to capture better images (sufficient light, sharp focus needed etc.), and to take it off and use the XHA1 native lens for the shots where it'd be safer not to use it (insufficient light, tough follow focus etc.).
However, I'm concerned that if I use the adapter for some shots, and the native lens for others, the finished film won't be seamless and the final cut will look like Jackson Pollock.
E.g. Will the difference in the image be big enough, that the audience, watching the film on a blown up screen, will be able to tell in which shots the adapter was used, and which shots it wasn't?
I'm aware that the inherent quality of the image will change with the difference in DOF and all, but I'm interested in knowing HOW MUCH it will change and whether or not it'll be noticeable. I'll be doing a lot of color correction in post, so I'm hoping that'll help to hide the difference in image quality and make it more seamless?
Feel free to shed some light if you have any thoughts. Cheers!