Deferred Contract Paragraph - Opinions and Advice Needed

Kevin McCallister

Well-known member
Hey Guys,

I'm looking for the opinions of some informed individuals on a paragraph included in the contract I plan to distribute to actors in my upcoming feature. In laymen's terms, the plan for deferment is for each actor to receive 2% of net profits, but only for a period of 3 years, which starts on the day the first net profit is made. I'll paste the actual paragraph from the contract below for you guys to peruse; my main concern comes with the part about the time limit, since I added that myself and am not too familiar with legal lingo. Please, by all means, let me know of any noticeable loopholes, lack of clarity, or other concerns I should have:

"1. PHOTOPLAY, ROLE, SALARY, DEFERRED PROFIT PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEE: Producer hereby engages Player to render services as such in the role of _______________, in the Screenplay, at the salary of zero Dollars ($ 0.00) per day, and in addition to profit participation of an amount equal to two percent of one hundred percent (2% of 100%) of the Producer’s Net Picture Income, if any. Player agrees that such compensation shall be deferred and paid pro rate with all similar deferments of compensation, on an annual basis, once such Net Picture Income exists, for a period of three (3) years from start of existence of Net Picture Income. Producer’s Net Picture Income is defined as the gross income actually received by Producer from the exploitation of the Picture, less the following: any distribution charges or distributors’ agents’ or other third party fees, costs of collecting delinquent accounts, sales and other taxes, the actual negative cost of production, and payments to investors in the Picture. Player accepts such engagement upon the terms herein specified. Producer guarantees that it will furnish Player not less than one (1) day of employment."

Thanks again guys for any help you can give me.
 
kevin - small minor issue

The way you define net income - it can be negative so effectively the 3 year period began when you spent your first penny. This is an error in your favor but may be unfair to the actors.

Just define the start of the 3 year income as a positive net income.

Its minor but you asked :)
 
Hey Kevin,

Sorry to say but the place to ask this question is in a lawyer's office with the clock ticking not on a forum where every wannabe solicitor offers his/her $0.02.
'cause that's what that advice will be worth.
And when shopping for a lawyer look for one with appendages.
If it slithers and hisses,--- beware!
 
you are being CHEAP and IMO ripping off your talent ..without them you have NO project... everybody knows % of NET profit 98% of the time = NOTHING ...

they work for you for FREE taking a huge risk that they will never see a dime and then you want to give them NET percent for only 3 years ... their acting is equal to your production $$. so are you only getting % for 3 years ? you only offering investors net profits for 3 years ... actors talent are equal to investors $

your actors are working for you & investors for FREE .. they deserve a chance to earn $$ .. give them their NET percentage ( which in cash terms is NOTHING )for as long as the movie is out there ...
 
I agree with donatello, but i think you should always pay your actors something up front (even if its only 10 dollars /day) plus a % for the life of the film. How about 15% divided fairly amoung the cast. it sounds like more.
dvxwheelr
 
Back
Top