I understand, for the most part, the advantages of the nicer fast lenses but I'm not sure if they would apply in my particular case. I mostly shoot above f/4 so I don't really need a fast lens. And I have a Panasonic GH2 which I think is actually TOO sharp. I find myself preferring softer glass because I think it gives my stuff more of a cinematic feel. I'm shooting low budget narrative stuff.
Is there any reason I should get something beyond a couple old, slow canon FD or nikon zooms that cover the range of focal lengths I want? I don't even really care if they have a constant aperature because I don't like to zoom during shots anyway.
Is my thinking correct here or am I missing some aspect of what makes a good lens? Like how they handle color or something?
Is there any reason I should get something beyond a couple old, slow canon FD or nikon zooms that cover the range of focal lengths I want? I don't even really care if they have a constant aperature because I don't like to zoom during shots anyway.
Is my thinking correct here or am I missing some aspect of what makes a good lens? Like how they handle color or something?