Egg Born Son
Veteran
At work I've been poking fun at the quality of our internal video presentations ever since I started my video journey. So my manager has put me on the spot at short notice - two days. Our operations manager (second only to the CEO) is coming over to give a presentation and my manager put me forward to film it for internal distribution.
It will probably not lead anywhere but since we are in the middle of a major restructure (it's one of Australia's biggest companies) it could also be an opportunity for me to put myself in the mind of those that count. All my development to date has been to the end of narrative video but I would jump at the chance to move into the realm of corporate/training video. However, I know enough to know I could be a little out of my depth here if I want to impress. I need help!
I will get access to the room tomorrow to do a trial setup. It will take place in the training room and will consist of a couple of speakers presentating in front of projected content (powerpoint, charts etc) to a small audience of state and local managers (20-30 people). I expect to be able to set up in the middle behind the first or second row. I am also conscious of the fact that the keynote speaker is female, around 50 and in real life looks little like her professionally produced photo in her email headers.
I'm not sure how to tackle lighting. I don't think my fresnel 3-point lighting is going to be of any use here. I'd be okay in a talking heads interview situation but don't know what is conventional for a presentation. And I don't want to crowd the presentation with anything complicated. I have two four-bank biax lights (220W each) at my disposal.
I'm thinking the main shot will have to be a loose mid/full shot to capture the projected content and give the speakers freedom to move around. Would it be more professional to lock this shot off for the whole presentation or should I try and get some alternate shots such as tight mid/close up shots as well to make the edit more interesting? Or should I zoom and pan as necessary to capture what's important? From a narrative background I'd say no but I don't know what goes for corporate.
Thanks in advance guys.
It will probably not lead anywhere but since we are in the middle of a major restructure (it's one of Australia's biggest companies) it could also be an opportunity for me to put myself in the mind of those that count. All my development to date has been to the end of narrative video but I would jump at the chance to move into the realm of corporate/training video. However, I know enough to know I could be a little out of my depth here if I want to impress. I need help!
I will get access to the room tomorrow to do a trial setup. It will take place in the training room and will consist of a couple of speakers presentating in front of projected content (powerpoint, charts etc) to a small audience of state and local managers (20-30 people). I expect to be able to set up in the middle behind the first or second row. I am also conscious of the fact that the keynote speaker is female, around 50 and in real life looks little like her professionally produced photo in her email headers.
I'm not sure how to tackle lighting. I don't think my fresnel 3-point lighting is going to be of any use here. I'd be okay in a talking heads interview situation but don't know what is conventional for a presentation. And I don't want to crowd the presentation with anything complicated. I have two four-bank biax lights (220W each) at my disposal.
I'm thinking the main shot will have to be a loose mid/full shot to capture the projected content and give the speakers freedom to move around. Would it be more professional to lock this shot off for the whole presentation or should I try and get some alternate shots such as tight mid/close up shots as well to make the edit more interesting? Or should I zoom and pan as necessary to capture what's important? From a narrative background I'd say no but I don't know what goes for corporate.
Thanks in advance guys.