Combining Shorts into a Feature

You also have to understand that failure at the box office is only part of the overall profitability equation -- most movies make far more from DVD sales/rentals, pay cable, etc. than they do from theatrical release. And those figures seem to be very closely guarded secrets, rather hard to find reliable sources for.

I disagree that "there are no shortcuts in this process". Robert Rodriguez found as many shortcuts as he could in the making of 'El Mariachi', even to the point of using the same guitar case for two different characters, rather than digging up a second one.

It could be argued that Mike Figgis implemented a 'shortcut' in his unique feature 'Time Code'. Not Oscar-worthy by any stretch of the imagination, but it certainly got distribution. Yes, it did have name actors. But we can't just not try something out of the fear that it will ONLY work if it has name actors.

We also can't worry that it might not make billions of dollars. The important thing, from a business standpoint, is that it make a decent profit for the investors. It doesn't have to blow the doors off Blockbuster and Hollywood Video, it just has to earn enough to keep the investors happy, so they'll give you even more money to make the next one.

Every movie we, as beginners, make doesn't have to be 'Citizen Kane' or 'Gone With The Wind'. We'll get to that point, but first we have to prove we can 1. tell a good story, and 2. make it worthwhile for the people putting up the money. If we can do that, then we stand a good chance of getting to do it again and again -- and each time getting to make a bigger and better movie.

I equate it with an actor just starting out. What actor trying to break into the business is going to say, "I only want to do really great, big-budget studio projects"? In the beginning, you do what you get an opportunity to do, and you use it to build your resume and make a name for yourself so you'll get bigger and better opportunities. You try not to do crap, of course. But you recognize that there's a ladder to climb to achieve that pinnacle you're striving for, and you have your foot on the bottom rung. You do the very best work you can do, and you learn and grow and network with each and every project.

At least, that's my game plan. :)
 
couldn't agree more, david. that's why i wasn't worried starting out with a short film and not blowing it all on a feature. i made the short for next to nothing, and it's proof to others (and myself) and can make a film. that's gotten through a few doors. i'm hoping my scripts will be strong enough to get funding and the short will be good enough to convince the financiers to let me direct.

i'd be more than happy to work on low budget films. less pressure. you make a film for $1M and it makes $2M then you look good. you make one for $100M and it grosses $50M and you look bad (and more people know about the failure).
 
Chapel Grove -

It appears you really like this idea, so go ahead and make a movie out of several short films.

I'm not afraid of anything. I actually did this. It failed, and I listened to the distributors when they told me why it failed. I learned my lesson.

I went to one investor and got all my money from one source for A Lonely Place For Dying. Why? Because superficially, it is an action/thriller, which sells like hotcakes at the AFM. Now, I can do anything I want within that genre and my investor will be happy. And am I some huge success? Nope...but, I am a guy who convinced an investor to give me $160,000.00...and I wouldn't have done it if I'd pitched a movie made up of shorts.

Clearly, you are very passionate about the multiple short story concept. I hope you do well with it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top