Chinese 2K RAW S35 Cinema Camera, 8000 dollars

I got word that Kinefinity (tm) has locked the hardware on the KineRAW-S8 (tm) prototype and has one "finished" for testing, some additions may be made by software and firmware update.

I need to get one to do some final testing and revisions of the color matching and other meta-data support through my de-Bayer program, so the plan is for that to happen soon, and then I may be able to get a demo reel pulled together to show.

The S16 and S35 will probably share some of the hardware and user interface with the S8 model, and now that they have a "working" S8 prototype for field testing, they can go back to finishing the S16 and S35 which are being pulled together to try to get general production in maybe 5-6 months now, at least as I understand things.

While I have been waiting I have been working on some improvements to my DIY film-recorder program for transferring the edited True RAW processed frames to 35mm color print stock for projection. DCP theaters may be booked by big studio films (more so for 3D studio films), but "art house" theaters may have openings for showing 35mm prints as fewer and fewer studio films are released on 35mm print stock, so that may be a way to get something shown in a theater before film projection only theaters all go dark, world wide I am guessing that will not be for another 8 to 10 years, maybe. Its been a while since I checked, but Kodak (tm) was still making color and black and white print stock with BH-1870 perfs for use in Acme and Oxberry process cameras (for optical and step printers), AGFA color print stock only comes in KS-1870 as far as I know, their still film is no longer, but 35mm movie print stock was still in production last time I checked. I'm not sure if Fuji print stocks have only BH-1870, I think Lucky Film print stock is only KS-1870, anyone know otherwise?

Are there any type of subjects that you think I should include in the S8 demo reel?

I want to give a sincere thank you, Dan. I'm so thrilled to have on-going input on this project. I know that you're NOT CLAIMING to be the "spokesperson" for Kinefinity (tm), but ANY insider information is great to have. Thanks for taking time. You are clearly a subject matter expert on imaging software and it is great to have your input and perspective. Thanks so much Dan!!! :)
 
I want to give a sincere thank you, Dan. I'm so thrilled to have on-going input on this project. I know that you're NOT CLAIMING to be the "spokesperson" for Kinefinity (tm), but ANY insider information is great to have. Thanks for taking time. You are clearly a subject matter expert on imaging software and it is great to have your input and perspective. Thanks so much Dan!!! :)


+100!!!
 
I got word that Kinefinity (tm) has locked the hardware on the KineRAW-S8 (tm) ... but Kodak (tm)

Dan, I really appreciate your posts and I learn a lot by reading them,
but why do you always type that "(tm)" thing.

I mean, yeah - we know that Kinefinity is a trade mark. So is Pany, Sony, Canon and what not.
But nobody always types "(tm)" when mentioning a brand.

Did I miss something, or is there a special reason, you always do that?

Frank
 
Do we really have to close this thread?

Cool it folks. Just cause its the internet, doesn't mean blowing up someones spot over a non issue is ok.
 
from a marketing point of view, developping a 2k camera today is a planned failure. Either you shoot for HD video and full HD is already available in many camera, either you still output to DVD and any cheap camera will fit, or you shoot for cinema and 4K is mandatory.
Only added features could be a saver like HDR or high speed (at least 120fps) or 3D.
Since it is a chinese model, the internal market could be big enoug to allow the company to survive, but i doubt american and european maket would dump japanese brand for a chinese one.
 
Why not? 90% of our electronic gadgets today are from China anyway. Even the most hardware is made in China.
The ability to shoot 2k RAW or Cineform at this price point would make me jump on that camera in a blink.
2 k is nice to have, even if you aim for HD, since it gives you some extra room for framing in post if you need it.
And for most theaters 2k is more than adequate IMHO 4k is way overrated.

Frank
 
Hi Dan
please film faces under 5600K and 3200K with shallow DOF.

here is an example but do not slam people against the wall. please make sure there is enough depth in the BG.
http://vimeo.com/17191894
thanks for doing this.
 
100K difference is pretty minor. There is more observable difference than that between my left and right eyes, about 1/8 CTB. Color perception is very subjective and inconsistent.
 
Dan
Please keep it simple for everybodies sake.
If u can please rent a kino 4 bank head with day light and tunsten bulbs. You'd be good to go.
I don't think it would be more than $50/day or weekend...

Thanks for doing this
 
Color (sorry, but I´m obsessed with skin tones) is one thing I constantly wrangle with on video, but the other one is motion.

I was on a test screening where they demoed different pro theater projectors at different frame rates

O.K., no artifacts (since they had really good prepared footy), no 24000Hz Voodoo-Shmoodoo.
The footy was from 35mm, Phantom, Red, Alexa.

60p got booed out instantly.

But I have to say, that the 24p and 25p versions didn´t really look like film ether (motion wise) and you got that stuttering motion (especially on areas with hard contrast), but only on the shots, done with the video cameras - the 24p 35mm film was the only one that looks like you would expect.
That leads me to my theory that most of the motion problems (stuttering) we see on video today , is originated in the way the electronic shutter works.

So I would really like to see a mechanical shutter on a video camera - I think this (or the electronic emulation) will be the next big thing.
There is a company (cant remember the name) that uses a real fast translucent led (you can use it like a filter in the matte box) that simulates mechanical shutter - the results look quite good and it could double as an variable ND.
But it´s quite expensive.

I would love to see something like this, build into a camera. You could preserve a nice flange distance (so you can still use about any lens out there) and have a variable ND filter build in.

Frank
 
Back
Top