if the footage isn't raw and 4k is it worth anything though?
hahaha, nice one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if the footage isn't raw and 4k is it worth anything though?
Think about it though. Good journalism also becomes less necessary. It was very important when you relied on 3 networks and a couple of Newspapers for information before the internet. Those were your sources. If it was wrong there, you'd never know.
Now it's much harder to keep secrets with iphones video taping everything, email conversations, twitter, facebook, podcasts, youtube videos, vimeo, pinterest, cable tv stations, satellite radio....
The WHAT still gets reported. The difference is now YOU are responsible for figuring out the WHY.
For example, there was a tornado in Oklahoma recently that did massive damage. EVERYTHING substiantates that, twitter, Fox, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, AP news, Bill O'Reilly, Rachel Maddow, and so on. No one disagrees on WHAT happened. A tornado.
They WHY? Everyone disagrees. Was it "global warming", "climate change", was it just weather like we've always had, is it getting worse, better, the same, unknown? EVERYONE has an opinion on that.
Used to be ABC would tell you WHY and you'd have to believe it. That was that. Now, they only tell you WHAT and the WHY is up to you to figure out.
I don't think that's so bad.
You're right. I didn't look closely enough - in that "politics" in the TOS actually encompasses a much broader category, and into 'controversial topics' and 'current affairs', which may, but may NOT have anything to do with politics. It's right there in the TOS, I just didn't see it. Who knows, would it make sense to break it out into a separate rule? Sort of like we have "no religion" even though the line separating religion and politics is much, much, much closer than the line separating "controversial topics" and politics. Regardless, point made - controversial topics. Still somewhat amusing to me that scientific facts enter this category (isn't science supposed to be the poster boy for unemotional objectivity?), but such is the world.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/1/43...ire-photography-staff-trains-reporters-iphoneChicago Sun-Times trains reporters to shoot with iPhones after laying off all its photographers
"The Sun-Times business is changing rapidly and our audiences are consistently seeking more video content with their news," the paper said Thursday. "We have made great progress in meeting this demand and are focused on bolstering our reporting capabilities with video and other multimedia elements."