Change of Heart Structure...

JonathanLB

Carbonite Member
How do you structure a story where your main character needs to change his mind, where you're actively suggesting he was wrong to begin with, sort of like The Grinch Who Stole X-Mas I guess, but I am having trouble wrapping my mind around what this would look like with my story.

Nobody is going to buy him thinking one thing, then the next scene he has a conversation, "Gee, well, you changed my mind!" No. It has to be something slow where an accumulation of events or things he sees sells him on the fact he was wrong, because no matter how great someone is, people tend to be stubborn about changing their minds on major issues. So what does that mean during the progress and obstacles stages, like Act II basically, that he continues to have more reason to believe he's wrong?

The problem here is he needs some sort of other goal I suppose, or it seems like it, where through that goal he comes into contact with elements that change his mind, people, visions, events, etc. And it seems to me it would be tough for his goal to be *actively* opposing whatever it is that he disbelieves. In other words, he's working against it, then he starts to change his mind. I am not sure that will work.

If I have this character basically holding my viewpoint from the start, there is no real character arc that I see, because he'll still feel the same way at the end (he is one of four characters in this film, all with equal screen time and separate stories). That is not dramatic and it doesn't really work, especially not compared to the other three characters' clear story arcs. So he needs some sort of clear story arc himself, and since the other 3 characters basically take the opposite stance to this guy (well, 2 do, the other 1 is a bit more on the fence simply because it is a pain in the butt for him but he knows it's the right thing), it's good to have one character at the start representing the views of some of the people in the audience who may feel similarly. He can be the conduit for change, like through what he sees, and if you identify with him at the start, you may identify with how he changes his mind and why if it's very well done. That's the key here, a very important part of the story.

So the question is... how is that done? How do you take this character and make him slowly and convincingly change his mind, not just suddenly, "Boy, I sure was wrong, gee golly gosh, I can't believe I didn't see it your way!" saying to his friend or something, haha, not going to work. But I feel if he's TOO adamantly against this viewpoint at the start, given the very limited time I have to develop him (25 pages of the 100), there's simply no way that you can make him about-face believably. Grrr...

I guess what's thwarting me here is that he CAN'T make progress towards his goal, whatever that is, because if things are going fine and dandy I don't see why he'd be likely to change his mind in the first place. It's almost like things have to get progressively worse and worse until he re-evaluates things and figures out he was in the wrong.
 
Last edited:
I think you are answering your own question. The char arc will happen through action, plot, events. Things the char experiences, discusses.

For example, I might be all for capital punishment. But what if I was required to witness an execution, an event, suddenly I might have a change of ethics and beliefs, I might even start campaigning against capital punishment-- if I saw the horror of an electrocution execution.
 
Hmm, that gives me an idea actually... Yeah when you said "capital punishment," that brought up death, and since that's something around which this plot revolves, that just gave me an idea that could lead to his conversion I guess.

That being said, I'm still not sure what the three act structure is here. Maybe he needs some other totally unrelated goal and alongside that, he happens to come into contact with reasons he should change his mind on this issue, I'm really not sure.
 
Ok I have something, sorta, it's a little messed up still though. It's just an outline, I feel the scenes (a few) are out of order, it barely is what I'd call fitting into a three act structure. There is conflict, there is drama, but it's not very clearly structured... I think it needs some more work, I'm not sure what to do with it right now. I'll give it more thought a bit later.
 
Curious Jonathan, what books on screenwriting have you read thus far?

Ok I have something, sorta, it's a little messed up still though. It's just an outline, I feel the scenes (a few) are out of order, it barely is what I'd call fitting into a three act structure. There is conflict, there is drama, but it's not very clearly structured... I think it needs some more work, I'm not sure what to do with it right now. I'll give it more thought a bit later.
 
Kate Wright, in her book, goes through a 12 step sequencing structure, both external and internal. I think it could prove helpful. I found sequencing to really help, and since she has you do both external and internal it will help you arc your character. Another related book is Paul Gulino's Screenwriting: The Sequence Approach. Sequencing is a tried and proven method, used by most of the early Hollywood screenwriters, and by many today.
 
Excellent, thanks for the advice! Boy, as for books, I haven't read a ton, I have read maybe 3-4 and can't list them all off the top of my head. One is just called Screenwriting with some other title after, it's mostly a basic primer it seems like to me, read it twice, once in college and once recently. Another was like, "Writing Screenplays Hollywood Will Love" or something along those lines.

Basically I love to read a ton when it comes to something I'm learning, like I've read a million books on short films, but I'm just done with them. I'm sorry not to sound bad but there is NOTHING left to learn from any book on short filmmaking. I read that one recently by the Sundance programmer about How Not To Make a Short Film and it was just all stuff I already knew or what I consider really obvious. I think that is when you know it's just time to create, and stop reading. Which I've done but I was wanting to make sure I had read more before I attempt sort of the ultimate short project, which would be for me the last short I'd want to do, maybe $25K budget, something important to me and substantial. And yet nothing has surfaced as an idea. I have four feature ideas, one is a rough draft screenplay, one is becoming an outline, the other two are just ideas. And no short ideas currently... just haven't come to me for whatever reason. So I wait...

I will pick up that book for sure, I'm a big fan of reading as much material as I can on something while I am learning it. I have been reading tons of articles online to help me, but I have MUCH to learn.
 
Yeah I've heard of that, I even feel I read parts of it, but I don't know if I ever read it all. I don't have it anyway.

Well, yay for more tax deductions ;)
 
I just ordered a bunch of books, lol, after I finish this next script's rough draft I'll be so busy. Probably sit down and then read everything I can get my hands on before I dive back into rewriting.

I'm wondering about something way above my head, but I'm kind of rolling with it and whether it's unorthodox or not, if it works, it'll work, and if not then it can always be changed.

Instead of "opportunity," leading to a change of paths, then by the end of Act I a clear goal, he basically REJECTS the opportunity, which sets in motion a series of events that progresses in almost the opposite structure of the typical screenplay. Rather than making positive progress in the first half of Act II, he's actually moving further away from his views, and half-way through is the point of no return in the opposite direction -- he now cannot hold the views he had before, and he cannot return to them. From that point onwards it's a bit different, like there is no progression of increasing obstacles so much as there is a progression of inner and outer resolution, where he faces the challenge of atoning for his previous opinion that actually led to a death (sin of inaction, not actually killing someone). He starts by turning opinions on an important council, which is private, and really has no implications in some senses, so it's an "I'm sorry I was wrong" on a small stage. After that, he has to apologize and explain humbly his errors in front of many more people, basically everyone who matters to him, and at the end of this he finds a level of redemption through his words and through coming clean.

Does that make sense? Is that any sort of a reasonable structure for what I'm getting at? It's not the typical protagonist has an opportunity, he sets a goal to attain whatever this opportunity presents, then he makes progress towards the goal, faces increasingly difficult setbacks, then just when it looks like all is lost, he seizes the goal and reaps the rewards. My character's arc is different but does it make sense how I kind of fit it nonetheless into a structure?

If not, well, it can be reworked in the future, but this is honestly what came to mind and what seemed to work dramatically.
 
Back
Top