I thought I would probably start a new thread for this.
Yesterday I interviewed at a really great production house. They're working on a few movies and looking for an editor PA. If I got the position, they said they would train me to be an assistant editor. But the length of the positio is 3.5 years, so I wouldn't move up until then.
It's a permanent position so I would be rock solid as far as job security goes, but what worries me is that i talked to a second assistant editor who started at my position 8 years ago and is now only a second A/E. The company is great so it has great employee retention which means... that if no one leaves, there isn't *really* room for growth. Maybe in a decade and a half I would be a first A/E, unless I really get a chance to shine (which could happen).
It's a great opportunity, but at my current position, I shoot and edit every week (it's C-Span style stuff so nothing creative, but it's technical), plus I set my own schedule and my own hours and can leave to go do my own thing anytime I please. I'm working on a feature-length nature documentary, an album and I write a new screenplay every couple of months, plus I can freelance (though the market sucks for me because I don't have the networking connections). I've got security to the end of the year.
So what do you guys think? Working in a pro film environment would be intense and lots of fun, but I don't foresee room for growth, and they talked about long hours and working weekends, which would mean no freelancing and maybe not even time to work on my own projects.
I'm thinking it might be better just to keep going the way I'm going, because I'm going my own path, making decent money (not as nice as there) but I have a better opportunity to do everything I want to do. If I take the job, it'll look fantastic on my resume but I have to give up my buffer zone now and won't be able to keep trying writing/directing/cinematography for 3 years and who knows what the market will look like then.
What do you guys think? The riskier, go-it-your-own-maybe-be-a-Robert-Rodriguez, or studio-setting-journeyman-maybe-room-for-growth?
Yesterday I interviewed at a really great production house. They're working on a few movies and looking for an editor PA. If I got the position, they said they would train me to be an assistant editor. But the length of the positio is 3.5 years, so I wouldn't move up until then.
It's a permanent position so I would be rock solid as far as job security goes, but what worries me is that i talked to a second assistant editor who started at my position 8 years ago and is now only a second A/E. The company is great so it has great employee retention which means... that if no one leaves, there isn't *really* room for growth. Maybe in a decade and a half I would be a first A/E, unless I really get a chance to shine (which could happen).
It's a great opportunity, but at my current position, I shoot and edit every week (it's C-Span style stuff so nothing creative, but it's technical), plus I set my own schedule and my own hours and can leave to go do my own thing anytime I please. I'm working on a feature-length nature documentary, an album and I write a new screenplay every couple of months, plus I can freelance (though the market sucks for me because I don't have the networking connections). I've got security to the end of the year.
So what do you guys think? Working in a pro film environment would be intense and lots of fun, but I don't foresee room for growth, and they talked about long hours and working weekends, which would mean no freelancing and maybe not even time to work on my own projects.
I'm thinking it might be better just to keep going the way I'm going, because I'm going my own path, making decent money (not as nice as there) but I have a better opportunity to do everything I want to do. If I take the job, it'll look fantastic on my resume but I have to give up my buffer zone now and won't be able to keep trying writing/directing/cinematography for 3 years and who knows what the market will look like then.
What do you guys think? The riskier, go-it-your-own-maybe-be-a-Robert-Rodriguez, or studio-setting-journeyman-maybe-room-for-growth?