How would you rate cameras for the top 3 to 5 places in the following video quality parameters?
I'm referring to all cameras which cost up to $6,000 new, either body only or a combo of body and non-removable lens.
Also I'm referring only to FHD (1920x1080p) at 30/25/24 fps.
Preferred are rating based on ones' own hands-on tests.
I'm referring to all cameras which cost up to $6,000 new, either body only or a combo of body and non-removable lens.
Also I'm referring only to FHD (1920x1080p) at 30/25/24 fps.
Preferred are rating based on ones' own hands-on tests.
- 'Film-like' look. (This is a general evaluation which includes some of the following parameters).
- Natural and pleasing colors, especially skin tones.
- Freedom from aliasing and moire.
- Highlights roll-off.
- Low rolling shutter.
- Performance (low noise) on low ISO (50-200 ISO).
- Dynamic range.
- Actual resolution, or apparent sharpness when the in-camera sharpness is dialed down all the way – with the best resolving lens.
- Low light (high ISO) performance.
- Auto focus and following auto focus speed and accuracy.
- Screen parameters (focus peaking quality, zebras, scopes).
- Screen quality, including visibility in sunlight.
- Internal codec quality. (It refers to the actual quality when undergoing grading in post, not only to the numerical data like bitrate and color downsampling).
- Internal audio recording quality.
- Battery life.
- Run-and-gun ergonomics.
- Static ergonomics (when mounted on a tripod).
Last edited:
