Callaghans Reviews PORN and Trailer Addict

[ConspiracyPenguin]

I love it when Nick says he's making his "final comment" but then keeps commenting.

You act like I've done this before...:happy: I can't help myself.

Edit:
By the way, Mark, I appreciate your attempt to

STAY ON TARGET
(as far as this thread is concerned)

:beer:

Well...excuse me! I apologies. I will move my shenanigans to a different thread.

 

[jpbankesmercer]

Callaghan, you sure write priiddy...Love it!

Top notch guys.

Much Love

J.P.

 

[J.R. Hudson]

Is Hudson selling a book full of blank pages?

Nice work on the review, Cal. I am of the same opinion regarding the state of comedy and the Apatow-supposedly-funny Empire.

I am I am

A storyboard and shot plannign jouranl; beats a notebook or clipboard. (hint hint)

From the above link--

Whatever the case, the usage is highly offensive today - heck, it was highly offensive back then. For that reason, "in a coon's age" makes many people uncomfortable, notwithstanding its innocent origin. You might try "in a dog's age" or "in donkey's years" (British), which have the same meaning. Or "in a month of Sundays," which avoids animals altogether. Better yet, do us all a favor and come up with an original expression. We haven't had a novel way of saying "for a long time" in a coon's age.

I understand your points and the sensitivity, but I assure you of Cal's nature and now that we know what the origin means, it's a moot subject isn't it ?

No offesne was intended nor implied nor had any weight once looking at the defintion of the term.

Callaghan, you sure write priiddy...Love it!

Top notch guys.

Much Love

J.P.

He does write priddy;