BBC: "Will 8K be the ultimate TV screen?"

Steve Castle

Well-known member
Some interesting things, NHK, Japan's national broadcaster, is skipping 4K entirely and going straight to 8K for broadcast: they expect it in 7 years, and expect 'roll-able'/felxible displays so that large display can fit in small homes. They expect this technology to offer larger screens in people's homes to give that panoramic viewpoint which will make 3D irrelevant. They want to mate this 8K tVs to a 22.2 speaker setup.

Pie in the sky? Maybe. But they've sure sunk a lot of money and R&D into this.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/9774380.stm

UPDATED:


Looking into this a bit more. There are several long-term trends that NHK seems to be predicting:

TV screen sizes will become much larger: This is natural. When TV screens were first released they were merely 10" large in the 1930s, grew to 14" during the 1950s, then gradually 17, 19, 21" during the 1970s. By the 1990s, screen sizes grew to an average of 17" and then above 30" as the CRT approached its maximum size [Source, DOC file]. Today the average screen size topping 4-", and 60" screens are becoming dirt cheap (a few weeks ago they were in the $600 range [source]. Larger screens are becoming cheaper. 4K TV sets are coming out on 84", but eventually we should expect 100"+ screens to become approachable financially over the next couple decades. As presumably, they want 8K to be a broadcast standard to last decades, they clearly want to make a standard that can accommodate massive screen sizes (the 8K demos have been shown on a 145" screen).

Flexible displays will facilitate cheaper and larger displays: NHK seems to think that flexible displays will be the next great display technology. Instead of having massive screens made of glass, a roll-able screens, more like a retractable projection screen can be installed in the house. The benefits being a larger screen can fit in your living room, it can be hidden away when not used, and more importantly they will be cheaper to make, stock, and transport. Flexible displays mean that heavy & expensive glass substrates can be replaced by economical polymer-based substrates. Cheaper plastic screens, not flexibility, is why Samsung plans to release one within the next year. Then there are logistics, right now, large screens that can weigh dozens of pounds are shipped from Asia, stocked in a warehouse and shipped to a retail location like Best Buy, Costco, Walmart, etc and then have to be transported to your home. A significant undertaking as size and weight increases, however, having a large screen rolled up like a projection screen means the display can be affordably shipped and stocked.

NHK wants 8K TVs to have 100° horizontal viewing angles: Currently, 1080p HDTV is around 30° viewing angle, and 4K will be 55° viewing angle . The prediction is as the access to larger screens increase, audiences viewing distance will remain the same as the dimensions of your home isn't as easily changed as a TV. Meaning that audiences will be better positioned to tell resolution differences. 8K by default is designed with cinema-style viewing angles in mind.

fig01.gif


NHK believes that 8K/super-high resolution gives a 3-dimensional quality to an image:
In many respects, its a large-screen version of Apple's Retina Display. Already, we have 5" screens with 1080p hitting the market (431 PPI). The same company has made an extreme version of this to test if you you can notice the difference of even finer resolution (651 PPI). NHK's logic is that super-high resolution imparts a 3D quality to an image, when mated with a 100° viewing angle will be more immersive than 3D, which is why they aren't working on a 3D broadcasting standard. AVSforum has a non-scientific simulation of 2K vs 4K vs 8K, it might be worth a look.

10/12-bit 8K@120fps is now a ITU standard: [Source]Several weeks ago, ITU made 8K a standard, rec.2020. MPEGLA will also make their next codec, H.265 HEVC codec, supports 8K resolutions and should be finalized in the next couple months. This new codec should also fit larger amounts of data in a smaller file size. NHK predicts this will mean 8K can be delivered in around 100 Mbps to the consumer. The current wired/wireless goal is 1Gbps for most homes by 2020. LTE Advanced has the goal-post of 1Gpbs as well (LTE means long-term evolution). Meaning, 8K video should be realistically deliverable in the next decade.

2020 and Beyond: NHK wants 8K to be the be-all end-all of standards. They want it to be a standard that can last not years, but DECADES. They don't want to be upgrading all the fundamental equipment some point in the future. Technology will get better, and they want the standard to not be outgrown by the technology itself. Which is why we have some pretty crazy specs, like 22.2 surround sound. They want these pie-in-the-sky standards to be the end-point, a goal post, for entertainment technology.

They want it so that every generation of displays, of cameras, of sound systems still can't catch the quality of 8K. By making the bar high, this actually helps device makers as each new device should have a noticeable leap in quality as the video itself should surpass the ability of new devices for a long time to come. It gives a very clear upgrade path which they hope will spur consumer spending on new devices.

fig05.gif
 
Last edited:
It definitely won't be. They would be selling no more TVs after that if it was. They'll think of something.

Now, about resolution again... I have pretty good vision, and I'm pretty sure I won't be able to see the difference between 4K and 8K. Even between 2K and 4K, I have to sit really close to the screen in order to see the difference. For my living room, until I'm thinking of a 84" or 100" screen, 2K is definitely enough. At 52", from a distance of 3.30m (11 feet) it's even difficult to see the difference between 720p and 1080p.
 
22.2 speaker set up? That's retarded. It's hard enough for a knowledgeable guy to get the setup out of a 5.1 speaker setup, especially if a room that hasn't been custom modelled for the acoustics. Most people don't even get their stereo speakers positioned correctly!

The screen is probably pretty good but as Samuel mentions, it's a question of scale for it to be of benefit but then again their target is for full wall screens. I've been excited about roll up screens since I first learnt of OLEDs but as Samuel has mentioned on another thread the lifespan is very short in terms of accurate colour and there is inconsistency in the manner in which they fail. Still seven years (plus the inevitable deadline blowouts) is a long time in the tech world and depending on the price point. If the manufacturing and material cost is low (once the process is industrialised) replacing them regularly might be plausible. It may even still have a smaller environmental footprint.

A 4K or 8K home projector will be a tempting prospect once the content is in place and the price point finds its way back to earth. I cringed when he went right up to the screen and almost touched it. Planning on having kids in the next few years and if there's one thing I've learnt from my nephew and niece is that grubby hands making a beeline for polished tv screens is a fundamental law of nature.
 
22.2 audio?
90% of consumers pile up all 5 speakers on top of the TV and don't even set up the subwoofer.
Those crazy Japanese boffins are hilarious!
Who is going to set it up properly?
Who is mixing in 22.2?
Is NHK developing a 22.2 DAW for mix engineers?
Who has 200" of wall real estate available to do justice to 8k?
Is there a woman on this earth who will allow it to dominate her living room?
How many 200" flexible screens will be bent into the corner of the loungeroom because "it matches the curtains that way"?
These screens will be the cause of many a divorce....
Sales will be high for single men
 
These screens will be the cause of many a divorce....
Sales will be high for single men


I think you may just have cut right to the societal impact of this technology. Women can distract you from your toys in the short term. But the toys always win in the end. Lasting relationships depend on accepting this fundamental. :)

Thinking further along the social impact line of enquiry, the full-screen walls will no doubt play screensavers that look like a garden or a forest just like in the scifi movies. So perhaps real gardens, real windows and going outside at all will become extraneous. Maybe a good thing as the world goes to hell in a handbasket. All the best scifi movies are dystopian after all.
 
I agree that 22.2 channel audio is ridiculous. Where would I put all those speakers if I even wanted to afford them to begin with, which I don't? I think 5.1 will be the standard for home theater setups for a while. With 7.1 being the enthusiast setup. 22.2 is way overkill.

At 12'x13' I have a fairly small living room and I don't have a surround sound setup going. I have two 12" loundspeakers. I could add the two rear and center, but my stereo receiver is a 20 year old pro logic box. No sub port on it and only 10 watts to each rear channel. You can hardly even hear them so I don't even bother. I'm fine with plain jane stereo sound in such a small living room.

We have to remember also that most people in the world aren't wealth Americans with big houses and lots of room for home theater setups. Even in the US there are lots of people like me who live in 900sq ft houses or apartments. Where are we going to fit wall sized 8K screens and 22 speakers with a couple subs?
 
From past history any tech breakthrough that gives really high quality will have a hard time getting established. The public are not exactly rushing to Bluray and they seem happy with VHS type video quality from Tivo type boxes. MP3 audio is hi fi to most people!
 
Half the population is still using old CRT Tvs in my country, and many people are still on 720p screens. It would take more than 20 years for us to get to that level so i don't mind this 'news' much myself tbh.

I laughed hard when seeing that 22.2 speaker setup tho'. We have 3 TVs in house, all on stereo. I have a 2.1 for my PC. Used to have a 5.1 setup but got 'tired' of it and changed it to 2.1 instead. Besides, most of the time i'm using a headphone anyway. I'd prefer a quality headphone over any speaker any day. 22.2, lol :D They better make it wireless then :D

Lastly, resolution is a good thing, that's for sure. But before having 8k cameras and such, can we PLEASE have a 1080p 12bit 444 13+DR 50-100mbits camera with a servo lens and battery and everything, in like a sony ex1r body style that's selling for under let's say 5k$? Why's everyone rushing so fast for this resolution madness, i don't get it really.
 
22.2 is the maximum audio acquisition channels it will support.

In another video, one of the lead NHK scientists said it downscales suitable for 5.1 or 7.1,
and there's no need for 22.2 other than possibly commercial installations.

So, keep your existing 5.1 or 7.1 setup- no need for anything else unless you want it...

Plus the 8K becomes useful as you use your 84" or larger screen for touchscreen- effectively you are an arms length away and
you can see pixels at less than that distance, remember you will likely have photos and multiple web pages games going at once
so camera-originated video will not be the exclusive content being viewed at that distance...
 
Last edited:
Touchscreen? You're making it worse!

And 3D gestures won't work for me either. Everybody saw Minority Report and though "wow", I just thought "dumb, there's no way I want to work like that". The future is an OCZ neural impulse actuator... except it's a 2007 product that arrived too soon, so let's hope the next version a lot more accurate and gets some traction. Muscles are so 20th century...
 
Why not just skip all this and have extraterrestrial alien gods beam thoughts and images into our heads via pink laser beams from undetectable satellites in orbit above the Earth?

For audio we'd of course need holographic sound systems.

I'm waiting for 32k TV, and 99 speaker setup then I will upgrade all my home theatre systems and video cameras.

I'm gonna wait for the holodeck before I upgrade my gear.

Once I have that kind of tech, budget will never be an issue as I can tell it to create anything I can imagine.
 
Last edited:
Quote from John Galt, Senior Vice President of Advanced Digital Imaging of Panavision:

A number of years ago some IMAX engineers - and I don't think IMAX ever let these guys out of their lab again -- did this wonderfully elegant experiment at the Large Film Format Seminar at Universal Studios Imax theatre. They showed this film they made that began with 2 rows of 2 squares: black white, white black, as if you had 4 pixels on the screen.

Then they started to double and double and double the squares. Before they got to 4K the screen was gray. Do you know what the means? There was no longer any difference between black and white, which is what allows you to see sharpness. It's the contrast that we see, not the actual information. Technically, the MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) was zero at 4K! Let's just pretend for a moment that IMAX truly is 4K. You watch IMAX at between one and one and a half picture heights from the screen. But in order to get to appreciate 4K on a regular movie screen, you would have to sit much closer than normal. In other words, when you go to a movie theater, and most of the modern theaters with stadium seating are designed so that the middle of the theater is 2 ½ to 3 picture heights from the screen, for most of us who watch movies, that?s pretty where we want to be sitting. Maybe just a little bit closer from some of us who do this for a living, because we're maybe looking for artifacts or issues. If you sit much closer than 2 ½ picture heights, that's what you're seeing, artifacts, not movies!

So if you had true 4K resolution in your local theater, everybody would have to sitting in the first 6 rows. Otherwise they wouldn't see any extra detail. Their eyes wouldn't LET them see it. You know this intuitively from passing by these beautiful new monitors at trade shows. You find yourself getting absolutely as close as possible to see the detail, and to see if there are any visible artifacts. At normal viewing distances, you can't. So the whole 2K 4K thing is a little bit of a red herring.

...just saying
 
You're missing the point Frank. They're thinking ahead on this one. After 8K wall-sized flexible screens there's nowhere further to take it. That's when they start unveiling the new eyes they've been secretly working on. New eyes to process the pixels we can't see. Once we've got Roy Batty's eyes we'll be able to see things you people wouldn't believe, attack ships of fire off the shoulder of the options menu. We can watch C-beams glitter in the dark near the network watermarks...
 
Back
Top