I not sure how to present this question (what a way to start off a forum membership
, but let's try this...
Desired end result:
A DVD that automatically produces two different images based 4:3 output (NTSC) or Widescreen (16:9). (No brainer so far, but stay with me).
The 4:3 image is full screen with the main image being the widescreen image in the middle and instead of black bars above and below there is additional video material--Sorta like the stock ticker on CNN, logo, commentary, etc.
On the 16:9 output that extra information at the top and bottom would be clipped off, leaving a entire widescreen filled with just the main image.
Purpose:
Both presentation methods take best full advantage of their resolution and format. If the widescreen viewer wants to really see the 4:3 version (unlikely) they can just put their TV in that mode.
Question:
Can you use anamorphic (what is it? line 23 of the signal?) to deliberately *trim* the height for widescreen (1280x720) and also compress the entire signal for 4:3 viewing (720x480)?
This assumes that the production is actually filmed in HD and altered in post to something like 1280x853 anamorphic.
Hopefully this makes sense and I'm not being clear as mud
- Mark
Mark Willson
Uncommon Technology
Desired end result:
A DVD that automatically produces two different images based 4:3 output (NTSC) or Widescreen (16:9). (No brainer so far, but stay with me).
The 4:3 image is full screen with the main image being the widescreen image in the middle and instead of black bars above and below there is additional video material--Sorta like the stock ticker on CNN, logo, commentary, etc.
On the 16:9 output that extra information at the top and bottom would be clipped off, leaving a entire widescreen filled with just the main image.
Purpose:
Both presentation methods take best full advantage of their resolution and format. If the widescreen viewer wants to really see the 4:3 version (unlikely) they can just put their TV in that mode.
Question:
Can you use anamorphic (what is it? line 23 of the signal?) to deliberately *trim* the height for widescreen (1280x720) and also compress the entire signal for 4:3 viewing (720x480)?
This assumes that the production is actually filmed in HD and altered in post to something like 1280x853 anamorphic.
Hopefully this makes sense and I'm not being clear as mud
- Mark
Mark Willson
Uncommon Technology