Umm made the retarded comparison to the lead time of a matteboxes to a never before made camera homey by a brand new company. When did they make cameras before that? Don't act like the big boys go to the lab and invent some new ****. Their just like car manufactures new features on an old frame. And yeah your the cause of innovation, your rippin comes off like cryin'. I'm gonna sell my Letus...no wait my sg....no wait my hvx. Make up your mind bra', I could give a rats ass about red cause the only thing we have in common is our dislike of fanboys of any sort. So be real man the big boys trickle the things out to keep a grip on their various levels of market. You act as if there is something altruistic about announcing something they should have had to market a year ago. How long have people on these very boards been playing with CMOS cameras...yeah Sony is real innovative. Oh and follow the papers bra Oakley was sold a totally separate company from Red.I ripped on the Brevis and alot of other things I owned and sold. Good thing I did, because none of the precious fanboys and delicate types were giving honest assessments (or warnings if you may). And guess what, they fixed most of their problems. So what's your point? Point I was making had nothing to do whether I like Brevis , Sony or Panny - it had to do with hype of RED's announcements and all the fantasy fanboys creaming their jeans about what they're gonna get for Christmas ... when Christmas comes. Now that's annoying - "Bra". Comparing p2 to red workflow...please, that's like matteboxes to cameras. And as if Red, I mean Oakley, is a little DIY company that's naive about lead times. Their hype announcements are calculated as they come.
Last edited: