JeganRX
Well-known member
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/26/g...-E-FB-SM-LIN-WTB-072612-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click
I realize this has the potential to become political, but I do think it straddles the line more than crosses it, plus it's production related, so I'll hope this isn't locked.
First off, what makes Girls interesting (to me at least) is simply how much of a train wreck it is, and indeed, the show's tagline makes note of this. You are supposed to hate the characters, and it does a great job of doing so, but I find it both fascinating and disgusting how yet another whiny twenty something gets a TV show just on the basis of complaining a bit more vocally than her peers.
Second, I must admit to my fair share of moping around after college, regretting film school, posting about it, etc, but I will personally say celebrating this negative behavior is the ironic icing on the cake for my own generation.
What are your thoughts?
I realize this has the potential to become political, but I do think it straddles the line more than crosses it, plus it's production related, so I'll hope this isn't locked.
First off, what makes Girls interesting (to me at least) is simply how much of a train wreck it is, and indeed, the show's tagline makes note of this. You are supposed to hate the characters, and it does a great job of doing so, but I find it both fascinating and disgusting how yet another whiny twenty something gets a TV show just on the basis of complaining a bit more vocally than her peers.
Second, I must admit to my fair share of moping around after college, regretting film school, posting about it, etc, but I will personally say celebrating this negative behavior is the ironic icing on the cake for my own generation.
What are your thoughts?