A "new" Ken Burns effect...

So the City of New York argues Burns was siding with the wrongfully imprisoned? The city refused to give interviews, so Burns movie unintentionally runs short on one side of the story. And why has investigative journalism to be "unbiased". Yeah they where force to confess, yeah DNA doesn´t match, yeah the true rapist confessed, BUT you have to understand the other side too.
Thankfully he´s got a name, so he will be backed up by many...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top