60i all the time?

bsmall

Active member
I shoot a lot of sports video. Whether it be for a recruiting video or a season documentary, I see lots of action. When putting these films together, I want/need to use a lot of slow motion.

As I'm shooting live action, I never know what will be worthy of receiving the slow motion attention once I begin to piece things together in the editing room. A player may have a horrible at bat or may send one over the left field wall. If he jacks one, I wanna be able to capture it in slow motion, but, want the feel of the 24p in the overall production. Obviously, shooting that at bat at 60i is what I need in order to have the best result when getting back to my computer and Vegas. However, I never know what's going to happen. No "do-overs" in live action.

My question is this - should I shoot EVERYTHING at 60i, short of a player interview or stuff outside of the lines, and will I get the same look on the non-slo-mo stuff when working on a 24p timeline, even if I don't choose to make some of the footage slow motion (40%)? Or, will it make my video look like I've used two different cameras?

Am I making sense here? Basically, I want the ability to present any live action footage as the best possible slow motion quality. However, I won't slow ALL of it down, and I don't want to give up the 24p feel.

Help a rookie out.

bsmall
 
The simple fact is, 60fps interlaced is better for slow motion (and action period) than 24fps progressive. There's your answer.

You can always simulate 24p with Natress, Magic Bullet, et al. if you really want the filmic look - and you can always shoot somewhere in between as well.

It's all about choices. If you want to get the best slowmo possible guaranteed 100% of the time-no matter what-no questions asked.. then yes max framerate all the time at the cost of it looking like newsfootage unless you doctor it up with plugins. Just go 30p and call it good.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top